aaronporter23650
In a 4 question LG drill I’m -2 easy. Throw an in out game and I’m useless.
Can someone point to the exact LR lessons I need to complete the in out games? Eventually I need to complete all of LR but I just want to knock out LG fully and just drill daily to keep the skills.
Figured it out. Drilling -> autobuilder -> Tags (you can tag each PT)
Is there a way to get 5 random problems from test 59 and below? I don't want to select the type, I just need to know they are from tests 59 and below to keep my other tests clean.
aaronporter23650
LG was by far my worst section (-17 on cold diagnostic), and now that is at a -6. I was planning on finishing LG, but these "in-out" games seem to rely on previous lessons in LR (I assume), is it time to pivot and do LR then come back to LG?
Also, how often do these pop up? I've done 3 PTs and never had one, just seq, seq twist, and grouping.
My post 2007 PTs that I haven't touched now has LR questions used. This only happened when I switched to V2, can this be fixed?
Wow, I have not been attempting LR questions correctly lol.
The audio upgrade is soooooooooo much nicer.
@marynuez206 said:
Hi @aaronporter23650, I checked your account and can confirm that you have access to the CCv2. You can switch to the CCv2 by clicking “Switch to v2” in the Syllabus. The same as the screenshot above.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you!
@alexsuarez757 said:
Hi @lujainaltawarah752,
You can switch between CC v1 and CC v2 by clicking "Switch to v.." in the Syllabus (https://classic.7sage.com/progress/). Please see the screenshot below:
If you're having trouble switching to CCV2, please let me know and I will give you access from my end.
We recommend that students switch to CCv2 since it teaches Logical Reasoning more efficiently and effectively, we recommend switching to CCv2 completely. Please note that the RC and LG lessons of both CCv1 and CCv2 are the same. Also, with where CCv2 is right now, we think you'll get the most out of your studies by switching over. There's no need to redo modules that you've already done, unless you find yourself needing a refresher,
I hope this helps! Please let me know if you have any questions.
Hi, I do not have access to V2.
I’ll be speaking in LG.
The way I think of it is comparing them to their “could” counterparts.
A could be true means it could happen, but doesn’t have to for the scenario to be true.
Consider a scenario where the only rules are X-Y and X-Z with the players being XYZ over 3 days.
You could have:
XYZ
XZY
Both satisfy the rules of X-Y and X-Z. In this problem, a could be true would be Y is in the 2nd position. This could be true, but it ISN’T always true, because the other scenario exists where Y is in the third position.
Now let’s take the same game and say what “Must be true.”
A. Y is in position 3
B. Y is in position 2
C. Z is in position 2
D. Z is in position 3
E. X is in position 1
Given all of these choices the only one that MUST be true is that X is in position 1 (answer choice E). In all possible scenarios X will always be in position 1, therefore it must be true. (Keep in mind, none of the other choices are false for could be true, because they all could be true, but they don’t HAVE to be true.
Jan is my first LSAT. What does the Crystal ball exactly tell you? Is it useful?