Q25 what threw off was the milk which is a raw product so even if it had an impact on evolution its technically not cooking?

The way i thought about it was roberts arguments could have been just as reasonable as britas -not necessarily MORE- but because she had better control of facts she won the debate. Not sure why this is wrong but still but oh well lol

Can someone clarify the differences between most strongly supported and pseudo sufficient

#help (Added by Admin)

Also most strongly supported vs pseudo sufficient assumption lol

I don't understand the difference between MBT and sufficient assumption, isn't validity a must be true as well?

#help (Added by Admin)

I'd argue that this question doesn't qualify as weakening. We're almost asked to support the argument even further by finding a missing premise

You have to accept the conditions given in the stimulus as true, you can't contradict them or choose a different realm of reality if that makes sense. Here, we're told that we're sticking to dry conditions so it's not fairgame to think about possibly wet conditions. Hope that helps

I'm in!!