Exactly my thoughts. And I would love for a more clarified reasoning for why A would be right since “failure to consider” and “ignore” are in fact two entirely separate things.
That doesn’t mean they are. They are actually not the same as to ignore something means to have knowledge of that thing, and to fail to consider something means you didn’t have knowledge of that thing to begin with or it could mean you were reckless in not considering what you should have. To me ignoring is an intentional activity while failing to consider something is nointentional. You can’t actually ignore something you failed to consider.
Although already noted that MSS Qs are similar or can even be mistaken as Main Point Qs, I am not fully understanding on my own (without J.Y. pointing it out) what wording in the question stem makes an MSS Q. just that, an MSS Q.
For instance, unless the Q. stem directly states or contains "....is most strongly supported by...." I really cannot tell what makes an MSS Q. an MSS Q.
#help
It says ”must” be assumed so its a necessary condition