Wondering if I can get some clarification on these, or if any of the diagrams are wrong?
A requires B = A --> B
A is required for/by B = A --> B
A is necessary for B = A --> B
A necessitates B = A --> B
A needs B = A --> B
All that is required for A is B = A --> B
Also, how could one use require/necessary such that it is B --> A, with B appearing in the sentence first?
Thanks a lot!
If I have a statement: A ---> C
and a second statement: B ---->C
is it fair to say A + B ----> C?
I don't use the individual rule method, but I can see why it could be beneficial for the first question (typically the ordering from first to last) on each game. If a rule is violated in one of the choices then you can immediately eliminate that answer choice. I find the major inferences you make on the diagram typically don't come into play till the second question of the game
can you take a contrapositive of a most statement? ex. for your first conditional statement?
#help the way he wrote the conditional statement based on 'only' has me mega confused. only poetry cannot be translated well. I thought the statement would be written as P --> TW . can someone pls clarify this for me?
if you were to use the negation test for the answer choice, how would you negate the conditional statements?
#help (Added by Admin)