I remember a question about doctors and handwriting as well, I think in my last of 3 LR sections. I had an experimental LR. I thought the the handwriting question was real. I'm an unreliable narrator right now though

Might be redundant but the LGs i had were Oil/watercolor paintings, trading buildings, Green/Red team, and Mystery clues

I believe (and hope) so. I had 3LRS and I think my first was experimental. I was anxious and had to pee for the first 3 sections (LR, RC, LR) so apart from the reading (Rawls, Migration, Insider Trading, Brain Scans--all stuff I was lucky enough to know something about beforehand) it was a complete blur

The moose one for sure. The rest I can barely remember.

There was one about a TRex in my last LR section (5)

I appreciate that and will take it under advisement. Can always see what happens over the next two weeks and withdraw if needed. If LG just clicks for me, then I'll be at/above my goal. Steering back to the original question a little bit, do you change up your approach to the newer logic games? It seems like fewer of them have a major inference, and the rules don't chain up as nicely/frequently

I've considered it, but since I'm not working full time right now and anticipate that I will be almost immediately after the December test, I've been going on the thought that there was no better time for me to prep. As it stands I can put 30-40 hours a week into LSAT practicing, which is a luxury I won't have forever. Under what conditions would I want to back out and postpone?

I have done JY's Fool Proof Method, which has been helpful. I have mostly done them by type. E.g. print off a bunch of different in-out games, make 4 double sided copies, do them all over a couple of days. More recently started doing entire timed sections bc i was freezing up during the preptests. it just hasn't "clicked" for me and I'd really like to get into the -0 or -1 range