Can someone help me understand how E does not mean /cured -> /M, which then translates to M->cured, which IS the flaw of the argument? I get the "sizeable subgroup" sets component being weird and squishy but wondering if the rest holds.

I'm interested! Class of 2018 :)

Question 9 - why can we infer it would be safe to consume by humans?

Question on ACs. Would D be correct if it didn't include "ethnographic" as a qualifier?

Question - could you reasonably argue that just because the bird population increased over the winter, doesn't mean it increased over the entire year? I realize that doesn't show up in the ACs but wondering if that is a valid gap to identify.

Is this a valid way to construct the argument?

A is long distance call through company, B is 10 cents and C is 15 cents

A → B or C

A and /B

Therefore, C