What the...... how?

WHAT??? A FLOWER SHOP SURVIVOR??? GRATS!

:/ to retake, or not to retake, that's the question

@dajunxu2229 said:

@alexandracao94856 said:

@dajunxu2229 said:

JY on flower game: "pretty easy/standard game, should take 5 maybe 6 min tops"

Too bad the test is not disclosed. I would of loved to see his explanation for that game

When did he say that?

I was just making a joke. I could just imagine him saying that in his video explanation

lol. I bet JY would start the video by saying something like "pretty standard, if YOUR LOGIC is strong.."

So the trick here was in the question stem - the arragement of artifacts wasn't a straight line, but a circle.

edit i meant stimulus

Just nasty. I'm now wondering if this level of difficulty would persist.

That LG was absurd. Every game had its unique component to trip people. Holy shit.

Manhattan RC Forum - look into their analysis on each passage and try to replicate it. I went from -14 avg to -5 by doing just that.

@kimht90675

I don't read the stimulus at all - I just go all C. The idea was to alleviate the stress, thereby getting more accuracy on the rest. And it worked for me.

On RC I make educated guess(es).

It's just not up yet. They're probably trying to figure out the ways to accommodate the digital lsat.

I was in same boat as you. I resolved the discrepancy by taking leap of faith; instead of solving all 24~26 questions, I took wild guesses on 4 questions a section. This allowed me to focus better on the rest, subsequently increasing my scores to upper 160s. Give it a try.

I really thought this thread was going to be about being a "sovereign" citizen. So disappointing :(

It's an embarrassingly long process. The recommender has to:

Receive an email from LSAC

Create a LSAC account

Do various info confirmation

Attach a word file (not sure about pdf)

There's an example of format on LSN.

I guess that 3rd LR was the experimental in the RC-LR-LR-LR-LG set.

I would love to see a blog post regarding employment statistics, region by region.

For instance in Midwest, Chicago and Northwestern takes up the big chunk of Biglaw jobs. Does that mean it's a battle royal among the rest (WUSTL, ND, UIUC)? What are alternative routes that seem plausible (like joining BIG4 as a consultant)? etc, etc.

Frankly, roughly three percent of LSAT takers end up scoring 170+. Employment statistics among the region would, at very least, broaden the scope.

Stim reads "One cannot (...) maintain A without B"

Lawyer I used to work with always told me comparing oneself with the others is a sure recipe for disaster. Although I would say redemption is possible, you should probably think about it - that is of course, assuming who the "someone" is.

I've already emailed LSAC regarding the issue. When you click on the "show different testing location," though, it would show the correct date.