@

I don't read the stimulus at all - I just go all C. The idea was to alleviate the stress, thereby getting more accuracy on the rest. And it worked for me.

On RC I make educated guess(es).

It's just not up yet. They're probably trying to figure out the ways to accommodate the digital lsat.

I was in same boat as you. I resolved the discrepancy by taking leap of faith; instead of solving all 24~26 questions, I took wild guesses on 4 questions a section. This allowed me to focus better on the rest, subsequently increasing my scores to upper 160s. Give it a try.

@ said:

@ said:

@ said:

JY on flower game: "pretty easy/standard game, should take 5 maybe 6 min tops"

Too bad the test is not disclosed. I would of loved to see his explanation for that game

When did he say that?

I was just making a joke. I could just imagine him saying that in his video explanation

lol. I bet JY would start the video by saying something like "pretty standard, if YOUR LOGIC is strong.."

So the trick here was in the question stem - the arragement of artifacts wasn't a straight line, but a circle.

edit i meant stimulus

Just nasty. I'm now wondering if this level of difficulty would persist.

That LG was absurd. Every game had its unique component to trip people. Holy shit.

I would love to see a blog post regarding employment statistics, region by region.

For instance in Midwest, Chicago and Northwestern takes up the big chunk of Biglaw jobs. Does that mean it's a battle royal among the rest (WUSTL, ND, UIUC)? What are alternative routes that seem plausible (like joining BIG4 as a consultant)? etc, etc.

Frankly, roughly three percent of LSAT takers end up scoring 170+. Employment statistics among the region would, at very least, broaden the scope.

Manhattan RC Forum - look into their analysis on each passage and try to replicate it. I went from -14 avg to -5 by doing just that.

I really thought this thread was going to be about being a "sovereign" citizen. So disappointing :(

I've already emailed LSAC regarding the issue. When you click on the "show different testing location," though, it would show the correct date.

What the...... how?

WHAT??? A FLOWER SHOP SURVIVOR??? GRATS!

:/ to retake, or not to retake, that's the question

It's an embarrassingly long process. The recommender has to:

Receive an email from LSAC

Create a LSAC account

Do various info confirmation

Attach a word file (not sure about pdf)

There's an example of format on LSN.

Lawyer I used to work with always told me comparing oneself with the others is a sure recipe for disaster. Although I would say redemption is possible, you should probably think about it - that is of course, assuming who the "someone" is.

I guess that 3rd LR was the experimental in the RC-LR-LR-LR-LG set.