wait im confused... they accused you of malpractice?

At first I was mistaken and thought the disney argument was weaker than the tiger argument. This is because I thought there would be room to doubt how Walt got his membership. Maybe he has connections? Maybe he paid extra for it? But then I remembered what you emphasized earlier: Just go with what is written in the question. So, there really isn't any room to doubt. It is still difficult however, because when I am reading the tiger argument, it is true. However, maybe it is because there are less premises and thus less support for the tiger argument, making it weaker.