Your client would have also had to cough up alimony in the event he cheated on his wife, got another woman pregnant, and that woman gave birth to his child.
So, the primary goal is to analyze the argument’s assumptions using only the info provided via the argument and avoid adding outside information or biases.
Lol, a great way to ensure that assumptions are checked twice. Also found the subtle insertion of "home argument-wreckers" hilarious and memorable enough to note.
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Sorry, you need a subscription for that.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
322 comments
Nice touch!
LOL @
homeargument-wreckersAnd here I was, interpreting it as $100,000 for every child born (in the world) during the marriage, which would be a LOT of money. 😱
hahahaha that's pretty funny
😜
Too funny!
Your client would have also had to cough up alimony in the event he cheated on his wife, got another woman pregnant, and that woman gave birth to his child.
So, the primary goal is to analyze the argument’s assumptions using only the info provided via the argument and avoid adding outside information or biases.
Thank you for the clip at the end, that helped wake me up!
My takeaway from this section:
I need to watch this movie lols
Anyone knows the name?
@Hfa The Long Kiss Goodnight (1996)
@deji Thank you!
That made my day
Better yet, when you assume, you make an ass out of “u” and “me”
Great ending towards the end of our lesson!
lol, W scene placement
Lol JY. you're too funny. do not assume people!
this anecdote really brought light to why the LSAT writers are so big on technicality!
My screen froze when watching that clip, I am in a public coffee shop
@Ryo and I on a plane lol
Lol, a great way to ensure that assumptions are checked twice. Also found the subtle insertion of "
homeargument-wreckers" hilarious and memorable enough to note.Loved this lol. Thanks for the treat!
When you assume you make and ass out of "u" and "me"
Well, what's umption got to say about all this then?
Had the volume turned up and my mom said “that’s what your studying” lol
@SarahShaver LOLLLL
love this! haha
Wait, I'm easily distracted and want to take a study break to go watch this...what's the name of this movie? lol
@Lemont.Williamson It's from a 1996 neo-noir movie called "The Long Kiss Goodnight."
Haha