Hi! Congrats! How did you improve your accuracy under timed conditions? Would love some tips

I’m in a similar situation, would love a study buddy for untimed drills. Let me know if interested

Could you share a bit more on how you got efficient at completing first 15 q-s in 15 minutes? Was it just lots of untimed practice?

Thank you! I can do more untimed drills to prepare for my upcoming November LSAT. My only concern with focusing on untimed drills is that my first attempt will actually be this October LSAT. Given that I don’t have much time left before the October test, would your advice still apply, or would you recommend slightly adjusting the approach?

@Kevin_Lin I am curious if you have any additional advice

Will definitely try this out next, thanks!

so basically, D is correct because debates don't always promote truth. As shown in stimulus, sometimes debates actually promote misconceptions

can we say that C is also wrong because it is too extreme/too strong? C uses 'anyone' instead of some, for ex.

can we say that A is also correct based on 'no cause, no effect' approach? There was no effect (craters on Mars), so it is likely that there was no cause (LHB hitting Mars)

can we say that D was also wrong because it tried to contradict the info given in the stimulus? because normally we take premise info as true, we do not questions the truth of it

why do we think that author agrees with hypothesis of Some Astronomers (hypo 1), and not hypo 2? They are both for the inner solar system bombardment. Is this because of the 4 billion years info?

I have a related concern - if November LSAT score release is in December, how does that impact the overall application process? Are we even allowed to apply to schools while the score is still pending?

wait, isn't E an example of the flaw 'attacking the source'?

@y00nislee Hi! I am in a similar situation, I am not very happy with my PT scores rn and would like to move my test day from Sept to October BUT I am also hesitant to move it because 1) the rescheduling fee rn is the same as just booking another test in October and 2) I could just take September and cancel the score if I am not happy with it. Any advice?

i am just gonna be proud of myself for eliminating the answer choice with 'should' and call it a win

i made peace with the fact that it is not really possible to understand everything right away and fully. i will just come back to this question later on..

i think i am starting to understand why negation works. until now, i would try to negate to see if the assumption is really necessary but i still did not get how exactly the argument 'falls apart'. i see now that negation works but you need to focus on the conclusion - does the conclusion make sense after you have negated the potential necessary assumption? If the conclusion does NOT make sense anymore, then you found the necessary assumption.

i understand why A is necessary but i still don't see why B is irrelevant ..

this was so subtle - i did not notice the analogy, so i got it wrong on both actual and BR attempts, but i learned to pay attention to subtle clues and see where the analogy is

this is the first time i got a 5 star question right but i think i approached this intuitively, i did not negate B to see if this is truly necessary

@Urbi_et_Orbi, I'm a bit short on time and I want to get more accustomed to working under timed conditions. My plan is to take the September LSAT. Would that change your recommendation? I know September might be a bit early, but I'm really motivated and want to give it my best shot. Even if I end up retaking it in October or November, I think taking the September test will be valuable experience. So I would love some tips and strategies that worked best for you :)

so basically, the NA is the bare minimum the argument needs in order to have a chance of being logical while SA sets the bar very high making the argument logically valid

used POE and got it right, but spent almost 10 minutes lol