- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
So I ended up getting the question right but only due to process of elimination.
PC(--some--)MB (I just reversed MB(---) PC)
PC-->P-->I
Inferences
1.PC-->I
2.MBC(--some--)P
3.MBC(---some--) I
A. Inference 3
B. Inference 3
C. Contrapositive of inference 1
D. Inference 2
E. Correct answer due to elimination (But I don't understand the answer entirely)
Thanks!
My brain melted trying to understand AC A..
= (
Can someone explain why AC E is the correct answer instead of D?
I'm in! I am on on East Coast time but I can adjust accordingly!
Just making sure I am right for the right reasons
Not being able to hear -----> Not every permutation is understandable----> Not Spoken Language completely effecient.
AC E
How would we possibly know its a judges opinion, I don't even think it's a valid assumption to think that, what if it was the opinion of the plantiff, or the defendant..or a witness? Hopefully Q's like this are not on current LSAT's
That made total sense. thanks for that!