So I ended up getting the question right but only due to process of elimination.
PC(--some--)MB (I just reversed MB(---) PC)
PC-->P-->I
Inferences
1.PC-->I
2.MBC(--some--)P
3.MBC(---some--) I
A. Inference 3
B. Inference 3
C. Contrapositive of inference 1
D. Inference 2
E. Correct answer due to elimination (But I don't understand the answer entirely)
Thanks!
My brain melted trying to understand AC A..
= (
Can someone explain why AC E is the correct answer instead of D?
I'm in! I am on on East Coast time but I can adjust accordingly!
I'm interested! I live in MD so I am EST!
Just making sure I am right for the right reasons
Not being able to hear -----> Not every permutation is understandable----> Not Spoken Language completely effecient.
AC E
How would we possibly know its a judges opinion, I don't even think it's a valid assumption to think that, what if it was the opinion of the plantiff, or the defendant..or a witness? Hopefully Q's like this are not on current LSAT's
Oh hi I just saw this, do you still need some help with this?!
I got accoms (don't wanna say how much) because of ADHD/Bipolar. Message me if you need insight. But to directly answer your question, yes you should if you feel you need it and yes you can get accommodations!
That made total sense. thanks for that!