i have done this many times. this feature would be super helpful!

yes

wishing you the best score!!!

No, he was just using that as an example that the answer choices won't make sense unless you read the stimulus. 1) Read question stem, 2) read stimulus, 3) while reading connect/analyze the statements (dots). For example, he did that with the first sentence, he connected the dots in the "Like a genetic profile, FmRI is..." and then 4) check out the answer choices and eliminate what is not supported or cannot be inferred from the stimulus while looking for the correct answer.

As he said, we should always connect back and hold tight to the stimulus

pretty sure there is a RC passage that is so close to this stimulus

Hi Kevin! Looking forward to learning from you

This was super helpful! I think I get it now. thank you!!

#feedback

same, I would like an explanation as well.

The only difference i was able to spot was the relationship aspect.

For example: "All dogs are friendly" does not imply a relationship. It is just a statement.

Whereas "To be a Jedi, one must be able to use the Force" implies a relationship, a dependent one. To be a Jedi, you must be able to use the Force.

That is my understanding. Please feel free to correct me if that is not the right understanding

Monkeys (subject) eats (verb) bananas (noun)

I am also interested! I am struggling with RCs at the moment