User Avatar
akivjh105
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

PrepTests ·
PT134.S2.Q24
User Avatar
akivjh105
Monday, Jan 23, 2017

oh man, I think I overthought this question a lot. The reason I didn't choose E is because I had to assume that McElligott's apple juice had enough bacteria in it in the first place to be more bacteria-filled than most apple juices that underwent intensive pasteurization. Plus they used the term "contain bacteria" which implies that intensive pasteurization can eliminate 100% bacteria? What? Of course both types of juices will always have bacteria in the end after pasteurization. In the stimulus, they describes intense pasteurization as being able to "eliminate bacteria more effectively than any other method" but does this hold for 100% of the bacteria in the juice? Maybe I'm bringing in real world thoughts to the question too much?

1
PrepTests ·
PT127.S3.Q3
User Avatar
akivjh105
Monday, Dec 26, 2016

Would you be able to provide a reason as to why E is wrong? "Yeah okay whatever" didn't really help my understanding

6
PrepTests ·
PT127.S2.Q24
User Avatar
akivjh105
Saturday, Dec 24, 2016

10,000 bushels of weed damn

7
PrepTests ·
PT103.S1.Q9
User Avatar
akivjh105
Friday, Sep 2, 2016

ahh okay, thanks

0
PrepTests ·
PT18.S2.Q23
User Avatar
akivjh105
Friday, Sep 2, 2016

don't both "only" and "when" in the first sentence trigger a sufficient condition? Since they're both group 1? So why is the first conditional statement "eff -> help IL" instead of "help IL -> eff"?

1
PrepTests ·
PT103.S1.Q9
User Avatar
akivjh105
Tuesday, Aug 23, 2016

If the sun's gravitational pull is weaker than the inner planets, wouldn't that imply that it is the reason why Uranus can get pulled by Neptune and Pluto? If the gravitational pull was strong enough (or "powerful" enough as the LSAT writers would put it), then Uranus wouldn't get pulled away as it would overcome the 2 planets' gravity. Or are we to assume that the solar system is in perfect equilibrium with the sun's weaker gravitational field (which would be outside knowledge technically), and that there HAS to be an external entity?

I fully understand why B is correct, but I still don't see how D is immediately irrelevant and has no case.

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?