Your argument is anecdotal, so yes it still can be. Also, redwolf90 doesn't imply that knowing how Goku's power thing impacts one's ability to pass the LSAT. That's just your rebuttal which is based on an assumption. Lastly, research has shown that one's familiarity with a subject matter impacts one's ability to more effectively comprehend (this is actually discussed in RC).
So 5 years late here...but I'm annoyed I got that wrong bc I chose D. Losing career opportunities may be undesirable however, that in itself doesn't mean litigation itself is desirable. There could be many other or more heavily weighted attributes of litigation that could make it more undesirable that trusts and estates (similar to the causation approach).
Anyone have an idea as to why the correct answer is B or how to approach this question in general? The only reason I can think of is that it specifies "immediately" which aligns with the stimulus. However, I don't understand why D is incorrect as it also seems applicable given the stimulus.
One could argue "our future colleagues" means law students who eventually become professors. Just because you have a higher education degree relevant to a profession does not mean you are active in that profession. I'm a CPA and had to take a communications for accountants class in my MS program which wasn't taught by an accountant (inactive or active).