User Avatar
alexiafaraguna234
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
PrepTests ·
PT134.S3.Q26
User Avatar
alexiafaraguna234
Tuesday, Oct 01 2013

yes, got it now. I just used the not part differently so I got what you had as the contrapositive first.

0
User Avatar
alexiafaraguna234
Tuesday, Oct 01 2013

yeah I went to the location and discovered the same thing, im just going to have to use what I have

0
User Avatar
alexiafaraguna234
Sunday, Sep 22 2013

and one last question --everyone has the 4 same sections and different experimental sections but is the order of the scored sections the same for everyone? not asking because of cheating reasons just curious why our preptests are labeled section 1,2,3,4- or are these just arbitrary?

0
User Avatar
alexiafaraguna234
Sunday, Sep 22 2013

and we write the certification part in script or regular handwriting?

0
User Avatar

Sunday, Sep 22 2013

alexiafaraguna234

LSAC #

Are we supposed to memorize our LSAC number to bubble in on the answer sheeT?

0
User Avatar
alexiafaraguna234
Sunday, Sep 22 2013

that's awesome. yeah the problem i was running into was when in order to was in the second half of the sentence, just wanted to make sure i was translating correctly.

0
PrepTests ·
PT134.S3.Q26
User Avatar
alexiafaraguna234
Friday, Sep 20 2013

hey jy, i got this question right but i translated the logic differently- the sentence that reads

it is rational not to acquire such info unless one expects that the benefits of doing so will outweigh the cost and difficulty of doing so i translated as

rational to acquire->benefits do outweigh costs

i got to that point because i chose one and negated it (rational not to acquire to rational to acquire) and made it sufficient.

but in the video you did it differently--could you explain how the two are different and if and why mine is wrong ?

0
User Avatar
alexiafaraguna234
Friday, Sep 20 2013

just to double check myself

0
User Avatar

Friday, Sep 20 2013

alexiafaraguna234

170 :)

I hit past 170 benchmark today, i know it's not the real thing but hey! anyway, wanted to clarify because it wasn't a trigger word/phrase i had writtten down "in order to" always introduces sufficient part of the argument? if someone could just reply quick that would be great

5
User Avatar
alexiafaraguna234
Friday, Sep 20 2013

i mean have to in the sense that you absolutely should

0
User Avatar
alexiafaraguna234
Friday, Sep 20 2013

i think you have to waive your rights-i know i did

0
User Avatar
alexiafaraguna234
Sunday, Sep 15 2013

I am applying this year for fall entrance in 2014. I secured recommendations from all my professors and employers months in advance, but to stream line for you here is my list. (I already submitted my apps schools are just waiting for my LSAT scores and then I can start hearing back)

-2/3 Letters of Recommendation sent directly to LSAC (you can print a form and hand them to your professors or they can just send to the lsac address but you should direct them)

-Personal Statement (Upload as a word doc 2-3 pages double spaced max)

-Resume (uploaded and formatted to demonstrate your academic work and extra cir. and well as any relevant work info or what you are doing in your years off from work)

-Request transcripts from the registrar at your undergrad univ. (i don't know how this works if you are still in college, I graduated before applying so I was able to sent a complete transcript I'm sure they'll send the most recently updated grades (have them sent to the LSAC address)

-Fill out each individual app. form for each school that is easy to access and pretty much the same with little variations depending on the school. these are in your LSAC account once you add the schools to your list

-Pay your fees, as if you're not shelling out enough dough already.

sry for the short hand, typing on my phone and that was a lot to type. hope it helps

2
User Avatar
alexiafaraguna234
Friday, Sep 06 2013

Thanks!! You explained it way better than kaplan lol they are the ones that confused me in the first place. the basketball analogy nailed it. so now on when i see if and only if it goes both ways so the contrapositives are mutual back and forth unlike when you have a if _ then _ statement where you can flip and negate once this way if there's no heather moving recliner there's no grace, if there's no grace then theres no heather.

0
User Avatar
alexiafaraguna234
Friday, Sep 06 2013

For ex-- Grace helps move the sofa if but only if Heather helps move the recliner. I just am not seeing the english to logic relevance I guess.

1
User Avatar

Friday, Sep 06 2013

alexiafaraguna234

IF AND ONLY IF

Can someone explain to me the implication of this statement? I know it sets up a two way street between the two terms but why is that the case???

0

Confirm action

Are you sure?