Subscription pricing
I hit past 170 benchmark today, i know it's not the real thing but hey! anyway, wanted to clarify because it wasn't a trigger word/phrase i had writtten down "in order to" always introduces sufficient part of the argument? if someone could just reply quick that would be great
5
5 comments
congrats man
that's awesome. yeah the problem i was running into was when in order to was in the second half of the sentence, just wanted to make sure i was translating correctly.
i.e.
"in order to hit 170, you must dedicate yourself to the lsat"
If you fail the necessary condition of dedicating yourself to the lsat, then you cannot hit 170.
By the way congrats. I remember hitting my first 170+ score. I started the test at 12:30 a.m. got done a little after 3. Treated myself to some french toast at Denny's afterwards :) It was a great feeling.
Yes," in order to" is a sufficieny indicator.
just to double check myself