come to Hong Kong :(

I bought the add-on. Also thanks @allisonmcmahon10493 for more info!!

Buying a 180 watch will cost me about $75 as an international tester...omg..but JY says LSAC hasn't reply yet if that method works

I guess I would get one too!

I would wear it and hang out with 7Sagers!

Thank you all!

I am better today (though I always feel I am better everyday during the past two months! lol)

Yep LSAT is my boyfriend now, and I've been dating 'him' for a long time!

I have a little tip for anyone who has the similar experience as I: Simply do things faster~ ! The depression brought by loss of love is that it deprives one's vitality gradually, and doing things FASTER really helps me regain the vitality.

It's tough but i think I can handle that, at least I won't die.... XD

In all, LSAT comes first!

http://www.buzzfeed.com/jameskicksa/35-signs-you-are-studying-for-the-lsat-b2tp

''The notion of jurisprudence as a system of norms or principles deemphasizes history in favor of the coherence of a system.''

what does this sentence mean?

is history in favor of the coherence of a system or is the notion in favor of that?

many thanks!

Thank you JY!

It works!!!

I have the same problems, even if I change VPN I am still not able to watch the html5 videos, any solutions?

I also tried to play those html5 videos on IE, Chrome, Firefox, Safari and am still unable to watch that..and I dun know why because I am able to watch all before May 4. It just suddenly goes wrong..and I tried PT 51, or earlier PTs, say PT5, cannot work either..

Hi, JY, I am not able to watch any video from 7Sage since May 4, it always says "html5: Video file not found".. can you help me with this? thanks!

I changed the settings and it works! Below is JY's Tips from http://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/340/html5-video-file-not-found

On the top right of the menu, you'll see your name.

Mouse over your name and a drop down menu will appear.

Click "Settings" from the drop down menu.

Check the box that says "Use Flash Player (prevents html5 video errors)".

This works with Chrome, Safari, and Firefox.

Note: using flash player will disable different video playback speeds.

Anybody know how to solve this problem? I am not able to watch any video from 7Sage since May 4, and cannot find where I can change the flash settings in the Chrome settings.

I don't understand why C is right, either

Get it!

Thnaks! :)

Hi Jon, I saw ur response here:

http://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/683/answering-a-question-problem

Just want to ask that by 'have to answer questions quickly' do you mean most of the time there's no need to refer to the passage?

Thanks!

Wow, thanks very much for the detailed explanation! It deepens my understanding of this question.

Sorry I didn't post the question very clearly...Because you said in the video that a correct answer will do either 'doesn't tell the whole story' or 'irrelevant to the point', at the beginning thought that 'doesn't tell the whole story' would be answer choice A.. And I post the question actually to ask what would a correct answer would be like if it is not something like A.

So what could be the possible alternative way to weaken the argument?

Thanks a lot!

What is the differences in the meaning between B and D here?

Can I understand what you said in the following ways?

1) doesn't tell the whole story: The dinosaurs die because of the toxic, but some other animals also dies because of that. So their extinction is not due to toxic.

2) irrelevant to the point: the dinosaurs dies because of reasons other than the toxic. so toxic is irrelevant to their extinction.

Hi Jon, how would the answer for this question would be like if it tells that the premise is irrelevant to the point?

Many thanks!

This is so AWESOME!

I thought the same way as you so I get it wrong at the first time. The either-or in the stimulus means that only a party with at least 30% of l=eligible prepared to support it by both joining it or donating money to it is viable in the long run. And now you see, if the two adds up, it's 48% more than 30% so why the conclusion still states that it would not be viable in the long term? That is because the argument assume that the two groups are overlapped, which means that the the ppl who will donate the money will also join it.

(E)negates that assumpiton. so weaken the argument.

Hi, does anyone know the meaning of subject to appeal?

Many thanks!

Get it now!

Thanks a lot, Michael :)