I think here in the conclusion 'Dealership rather than National Rental is more worthwhile for Local than for Tourists', the extent of WORTHWHILE is measure by the difference of money spent on dealership and national rental. For example, if it cost the tourists 50 to use dealership and 70 to use national rental, while it costs locals 30 to use dealership and 80 to use national rental, we say it is more worthwhile for locals than tourists because for the tourists the difference is only 20 but for the locals the difference is 50.

Therefore, for answer choice B, if the tourists spend extra money on taxi rides, that is new information hinting the difference should be somewhat narrowed. Therefore strengthen the conclusion.

It didn't come up to me the assumption that the national rental is near the airport..so I reread the conclusion and figure it out in the way above.

Hi, everyone, for question #12, why the cultural conservatism is EXEMPLIFIED by uncritical attitude ? Because the two concepts lie in two pragraphs, and I don't see a connection/relation being explicitly specify, so why does the former is exemplified the latter?

Can anyone explain this?

''The notion of jurisprudence as a system of norms or principles deemphasizes history in favor of the coherence of a system.''

what does this sentence mean?

is history in favor of the coherence of a system or is the notion in favor of that?

many thanks!

Hi Jon, I saw ur response here:

http://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/683/answering-a-question-problem

Just want to ask that by 'have to answer questions quickly' do you mean most of the time there's no need to refer to the passage?

Thanks!

should I look at the question before I read the argument?

What is the differences in the meaning between B and D here?

Hi Jon, how would the answer for this question would be like if it tells that the premise is irrelevant to the point?

Many thanks!

I bought the add-on. Also thanks @ for more info!!

I guess I would get one too!

I would wear it and hang out with 7Sagers!

Thank you all!

I am better today (though I always feel I am better everyday during the past two months! lol)

Yep LSAT is my boyfriend now, and I've been dating 'him' for a long time!

I have a little tip for anyone who has the similar experience as I: Simply do things faster~ ! The depression brought by loss of love is that it deprives one's vitality gradually, and doing things FASTER really helps me regain the vitality.

It's tough but i think I can handle that, at least I won't die.... XD

In all, LSAT comes first!

http://www.buzzfeed.com/jameskicksa/35-signs-you-are-studying-for-the-lsat-b2tp

I don't understand here is that I think if to negate C.' When signaling each other with sounds or gestures, animals refers to neither concrete objects nor abstract ideas' that means when animals signal with sounds or gestrues, they refer to EITHER CB or AI. Does it contradict with ' it does not prove that animals possess the ability to use sounds or gestures to refer to CB or AI' ?

I mean, it seems to me that if it use sounds or gestures to refer to CB or AI, they have the ability to use sounds or gestures to ferfer to CB or AI?

Is it because 'it does not prove that animals possess the ability to use sounds or gestures to refer to CB or AI' is a premise of the argument, and we should never attack the premise, and should always attack the loopholes between premise and conclusion, so C is not right?

What do you guys think? Thanks!

@

given A I don't see the conclusion is justified..because the argument doesn't state that if sth is irrelevent to accuracy, it is not advised to affect that thing..

(But it seems a psudo-sufficient one...)

Does it mean if I am attacking question asking the principle underlying the argument, I can see it as asking a psyudo-sufficient assumption?

Many thanks!

If so, I understand now.

Because only M agrees with K, so it would be acceptable only that K at least votes for M or K votes for nobody. Therefore B is right.

Thanks, @.

Thank you @.

Reading this(At this point we should be wary of confidence of witnesses, or at least of the factors that affect their confidence.), I wonder if the question 'Which one of the following is a principle underlying the advice given to police officers? ' can be interpreted into ' What is the necessary assumption underlying the advice' ?

Hi, does anyone know the meaning of subject to appeal?

Many thanks!

come to Hong Kong :(

Thank you JY!

It works!!!

I have the same problems, even if I change VPN I am still not able to watch the html5 videos, any solutions?

I also tried to play those html5 videos on IE, Chrome, Firefox, Safari and am still unable to watch that..and I dun know why because I am able to watch all before May 4. It just suddenly goes wrong..and I tried PT 51, or earlier PTs, say PT5, cannot work either..

Hi, JY, I am not able to watch any video from 7Sage since May 4, it always says "html5: Video file not found".. can you help me with this? thanks!

I changed the settings and it works! Below is JY's Tips from http://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/340/html5-video-file-not-found

On the top right of the menu, you'll see your name.

Mouse over your name and a drop down menu will appear.

Click "Settings" from the drop down menu.

Check the box that says "Use Flash Player (prevents html5 video errors)".

This works with Chrome, Safari, and Firefox.

Note: using flash player will disable different video playback speeds.

Anybody know how to solve this problem? I am not able to watch any video from 7Sage since May 4, and cannot find where I can change the flash settings in the Chrome settings.

Buying a 180 watch will cost me about $75 as an international tester...omg..but JY says LSAC hasn't reply yet if that method works

I find that the main point question is rather hard to find out which is the MP...I chose B because I thought that 'But this view ignores....' is the MP.

After viewing this video I know it is not. But still hard for me to recognize the MP (for hard questions in LR and RC), though most are not that hard.