PTB S1 Q16
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
TO BE CLEAR, A AND C ARE INCORRECT BECAUSE THEY ARE PREDICTIONS OF THE FUTURE WHICH CANNOT BE A MUST BE TRUE, RIGHT? THEREFORE, WHEN AN AC IS A PREDICTION OF THE FUTURE, IT IS RULED AS INCORRECT? #help#feedback
I understand why AC A is right. However, why isnt AC E more right? its bc Market share did not necessarily fall bc as stimulus said "total number of meals sold in our company's restaurants was much higher than it was last year" right? #help#feedback
good inference but remember not to use background knowledge when answering questions. if it did not say it in the stimulus, disregard it. thats why u got it wrong. AC E said it "can be altered" meaning there is a possibility is could be altered.
Can someone reword AC C in a simpler way? I have read it 20 times and idk why I cant understand it.
#help Added by Admin
I love 7sage, but why use old questions that are not like the questions that are asked now? Why teach us a question that requires an assumption the modern LSAT would not require of us?
For the new update, pls scratch these types of questions off the study guide. #feedback
So we cant assume that participate means generate? But why? someone pls explain #help
It all makes sense when I watch the explanation video. When I read it first time, it does not. Any advice? #help#feedback
B is wrong bc it never mentions air sacs so we cannot assume. D is right bc air sacs are mentioned and the appearance of the air sacs with infections is an appropriate assumption
Why is A wrong? I know that "commercially important fish" was not introduced in the stimulus but on causation weakening questions, we are supposed to find alternative causes. I saw commercially important fish as an alternative competing cause. How do I decipher between irrelevant info and alternative causes in the multiple choices? #help#feedback#help#help#help#help#help
The explanation for why C is wrong is "what??" PLS 7SAGE, explain why it is wrong in a detailed way, not by being a smarty and saying "what? obviously its not right."
Can someone explain to me why C is wrong pls? #help #feedback
The right answer B, "the current theory does not fully explain earthquake data." sounds EXACTLY like A "no increases of temperature have been detected following earthquakes." Current theory= increase of temp. Does not fully explain earthquake data= have not been detected.
Pls someone dumbify this for me. I have been trying to understand this for like an hour. #help#feedback#help#feedback#help
On the first lesson on 7Sage, it stated that the tutor will be using main conclusion and main point interchangeably, and that it means the EXACT SAME THING. And now you are saying that main point is more contextual, picking a more big picture summary and main conclusion is pulling an exact line. :( I wish the tutor had said this in the beginning. 7Sage, pls add this bc if I hadnt stumbled on ur comment RaphaelP, I would have been pulling my hair out still, 2 months later, to try to figure this out.
What is considered an inference?
#help (Added by Admin)