Can you import scoring etc. from law hub to 7sage for analytical purposes?
I love taking PT's on 7Sage. It's easy and intuitive. I especially love the multi-colored highlighting features for singling out context, premises and conclusion. What I want to know is if I will be thrown for a loop when I take the official LSAT in October? How much different, if at all, will it be? Will features like highlighting still be available?
Yes, they take everything you've taken for credit in college at any level and combine them. Unfortunately, people's LSAC GPA is lower than any 'cumulative' GPA that you'll see listed on any one of your college transcripts. I'm still in the process, but once you upload all of your transcripts to LSAC and they're processed, you should see your LSAC GPA. It's recommended to write a 'GPA addendum' in addition to your applications if you want to explain pockets of poor performance, or inconsistencies in your grades.
I knew the anti-inflammatory drug statement was a premise, but tossed it immediately bc I got hung up on the medical jargon in the remaining statements, statements which obviously were already pretty relevant.
I had B on the my first play through, but during BR I saw it just required way too many assumptions to make it work.
I thought I was so slick for choosing A
Thank you guys. I suspected as much. If PT's 1-3X are used for drilling material because they are considered too old to represent the current format, then I would think PTs from the early 2000's wouldn't be as representative of the test as ones from just 10 years ago. I will be sure to keep it in mind to save some tests just in case I have to retake in December.
My instinct kept on telling me to choose E, but ultimately I felt like since the 'degree' of increase in income was not stated in the AC, then I was not to assume it was the same for everyone.
edit - Now that I see this is a MSS question, we're not looking for guaranteed validity of the argument. You win again, LSAT.
Missed the jump from national to 'large' the first time through. Caught it in BR. Very sneaky.
Hello everyone. So I’m taking the October 2021 test. I’m through with the core curriculum and I’m currently on practice test 42. I just tested a 162 (BR 170) w extra time, (trying to master the concepts first, then chip away at the time.) My goal is the mid at 160's under normal conditions. My senior undergrad semester starts in mid August so I won’t be able to devote as much time to studying like I am during this summer. I'm an older student with a very heavy and difficult-to-average-up GPA. Getting a 4.0 this semester is critical to getting my overall GPA where I want it. My question is this. It usually takes me 2 to 3 days to move on from one test to the next, after taking it, BRing, watching explanations and taking notes (bc I really try not to rush and take each stage seriously.) Anyway, if I maintain that, there’s no feasible way that I’m going to get through all the remaining PTs by October. But I’m not sure if just going in order and ending on PT 60 or something by the time the October test rolls around is a good idea. There will be dozens and dozens and years worth of tests that I will leave undone. Should I skip around? Take every other 3rd of 4th test? Focus on the most recent ones like the last 20-30? Anyone’s advice as to how to approach this would be greatly appreciated.
B didn't even make grammatical sense to me. "...when a state of affairs does not obtain that would be expected to obtain if..." I've never heard a statement constructed like that in my entire life. Is it meant to translate to "...what it would be expected to obtain..."
yeah, its struggling big time
I read B and let my bias get in the way. “Cultural identity will decrease if the nation is economically wealthy? Lol no.” I literally laughed it off and moved on, but that’s precisely what the argument is saying.
I just checked it out. Totally fine! Highlights, bookmarks, layout options are all pretty much in the same place. Thanks a lot!