User Avatar
arthurbersin515
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
arthurbersin515
Tuesday, Oct 29 2019

@ said:

@ said:

Did anyone experience any technical issues with the tablet & stylus?

No technical issues with the tablet & stylus itself but we had administrative issues with assigning tablets/seats. We started our test about 45 min AFTER the scheduled time 😡

we started 2 1/2 hrs late

PrepTests ·
PT113.S3.Q7
User Avatar
arthurbersin515
Tuesday, Aug 29 2017

Chose D and changed to C during BR since where did we say anything about "voluntary" changing of rock singers?

PrepTests ·
PT101.S2.Q2
User Avatar
arthurbersin515
Tuesday, Aug 29 2017

I was almost thrown off by the fact that "a brightly colored toy sells better than the same toy..."- which doesn't necessarily point to any preference of infants. Furthermore, it clearly doesn't differentiate between any colors.. But being a "2)" i chose the more blatant answer choice. Is that a bad habit?

User Avatar
arthurbersin515
Sunday, Nov 26 2017

I've been stressing so hard about this test and I'm a big anxious eater. Does this mean I have to lose the 50 lbs I've gained to match my pic on test day!!!!!!???

;)

User Avatar
arthurbersin515
Tuesday, Jan 14 2020

I took internationally.

I had 1 RC and I believe it involve tribal wagwam Indians and fur trading. Anyone know if international tests are different than the states?

Also Does anybody remember an LR with a q about yeast?

PrepTests ·
PT129.S2.Q18
User Avatar
arthurbersin515
Thursday, Sep 12 2019

I originally go tricked into thinking A was the right answer choice since the analogy was "No person would take prescription from avg. people/persons" and the analogous statement would be "no public servant would take the advice of the avg. public" which is (A).

I think I tend to overanalyze the ACs. #help how do I stop the overthinking?

User Avatar
arthurbersin515
Sunday, May 10 2020

Thanks everyone!

User Avatar

Tuesday, May 05 2020

arthurbersin515

Cycle recap

I just wanted to express a thanks to all who share their anxieties on this forum because it really helped me hurdle the pressures of apps and studying throughout my journey.

I started studying in summer 18 through 7sage. I ended up putting my career on hold to get married and move abroad. All the while extending my account periodically because I knew I would want to eventually take the lsat and go to law school. Just keeping connected to this community and the dedication of the constant posters helped me muster up enough courage to get back on the horse. Either way I started studying again in June 2019 for the Oct test. I took a diagnostic at 147 timed. That was upsetting but I knew I couldn't just assume I was gonna kill this test without work. I took all but the last 12 pts and got a 160 on the Oct test. I knew I was able to get a few points higher and pushed myself for the January test. I applied to a bunch of schools with that score but told them I was taking a future test and they held my app until my next score came. Finally to my joy I received my Jan test score back. A 164. At that point I was content and decided thats the best I can do I tried twice let's see what happens.

Ok. So a 164 3.86 from an online college BA.

Here's my cycle can't remember dates but my score didn't allow my apps to get to review until the middle of Feb.

University of Houston- accepted with big Scholly

University Cincinnati- same as above

Scu law tech edge program- same as above

Cardozo law- huge Scholly

Loyola L.A.- accepted

Asu-waitlist

After my new score I applied to a few more schools

Bc- accepted half Scholly

Emory- priority wl

Bu- wl

Gw- accepted w some Scholly

UcL.A.- wl

Wustl- accepted with more than half

The reason I'm writing this is not to show off. It's because everyone gets too caught up in the numbers and I see it really holds people back from not only studying but also even applying to schools where they are way below the median. Keep healthy.

Thanks 7sage for making my ride a lot more informed and fearless.

User Avatar
arthurbersin515
Sunday, Aug 04 2019

Why not try to put A/BC in the out column which means if B and C are in then A is out and vis a vis.

If B and C are out A must be in so the rule is A/BC

When the rule is: A then -B or -C then that would mean if either B or C is in A is out. Notation would be A/B/(mini slash)C in the out column

Does this make sense?

Confirm action

Are you sure?