Confused because I did not choose AC (E) since I felt like I was supposed to assume that qwerty/the standard was "in wide use"? All of the AC's just seemed like I needed to have big assumptions in order to match them to the stimulus. Any tips or clarification?

The "implicit" statement that the presence of BA protein caused microglia to attack was not at all in my mind. I was trying to find the cause for the microglia to attack...

Crying because how am I supposed to understand and find that in 1 min and 25 secs? #help

When the question asks about undermining the reasoning, or in general refers to reasoning, is it referring to the premise of the argument?

My main question is, how do we chose between the flaws that we predict if there are multiple in the stim & both predictions appear in the AC's?

I got 5/5 correct, but I am taking too much time on the questions. Any tips?

I need to work on finding the difference in subject-noun and the predicate-object; since that seems to effect the entire breakdown.

But if the premise doesn't support the conclusion, is it not a relationship, thus not an argument?