My dog is so bad, that I just don't know what to do. She won't listen to a thing I say. Discipline her or ignore the behavior? I feel so attacked right now
How can we open this by saying it's weaken question when the stimulus states that the argument is flawed and proceeds to ask us what it fails to consider (the hallmarks of a flaw question based on the previous two lessons)?
Additionally, the tags for this question are "Flaw" and "Causal Reasoning"
Genuinely not comprehending how this is a weaken question outside of the fact that the identified flaw will weaken the question, as we already learned: "Hey, argument, you're about to get punched in the face" whereas weakening questions were "I just punched you in the face"
I am confused because you said that answer c was wrong in that it just denies the conclusion, and we are instead trying to weaken the argument, but the right answer is also denying the conclusion by saying that there is an alternative hypothesis, no?
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
44 comments
My dog is so bad, that I just don't know what to do. She won't listen to a thing I say. Discipline her or ignore the behavior? I feel so attacked right now
The plot twist at the end...no wonder I was so confused at first. LMAO
How can we open this by saying it's weaken question when the stimulus states that the argument is flawed and proceeds to ask us what it fails to consider (the hallmarks of a flaw question based on the previous two lessons)?
Additionally, the tags for this question are "Flaw" and "Causal Reasoning"
Genuinely not comprehending how this is a weaken question outside of the fact that the identified flaw will weaken the question, as we already learned: "Hey, argument, you're about to get punched in the face" whereas weakening questions were "I just punched you in the face"
#help #feedback
I am confused because you said that answer c was wrong in that it just denies the conclusion, and we are instead trying to weaken the argument, but the right answer is also denying the conclusion by saying that there is an alternative hypothesis, no?
Am I the only one whose QuickView question was different than the video?
Michael Vick
"I cast Ghost of Strife!" -Yugi, probably
"My donkey looks nothing like my dog!" LOL. Not angry at all as I stink at Weakening Questions previously so needed this.
I'm upset and angy
How could you, J. Y.; I don't think I'll ever recover from this 🥲
At least J.Y. makes the pain of the LSAT a little more bearable🥲
"that's fantastic! What do I do with this information?" is a go-to line now.
"we should both take some time to cool off" great, now 7sage is breaking up with me
"I put it to you, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, that a ghost of strife..."
I knew something was off... ;(
idk if i can forgive u JY…
still cooling off...
I did not expect the last couple of seconds of this lesson
"My donkey looks nothing like my dog." Amazing!
Confirmed: JY is a trickster :(
Did JY just lie to me.....
#feedback i think there shoiuld be a theory and approach for this question type
this is why I have trust issues