- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
#feedback #help
Question 8.4 - Subject: "Discriminating on the basis of race or gender"
Predicate: "is unconstitutional"
D: for subject
U: for predicate
Based on the previous lesson, if i picked the subject as my sufficient and negated. The lawgic would be ‑D→U and the contrapositive would be ‑U→D
I'm not grasping why the subject was not negatated as we were taught to do so in the previous lessons.
Hi, Cole if i were you i would not retake. Your LSAT Score is only one component of your overall app. You still have personal statement, optional essays and etc. you could very well aim for a higher score above your goal schools median and still not get in to your top T14 choice. your score matters but it is not everything. if you can, reach out to the schools you're interested in. speak with someone and disclose your stats. Why retake it if you can put more energy into capitalizing off what you have left to do? Get some volunteer work in if you can. Admissions committees want to know you who are outside of just your score and GPA. Congrats on your 167 btw! you're doing gr8, but you know better than anyone in the comments what best for you.
#feedback
Kick it up to the domain: "Birds".
P1: Migrate south --> winter
P2: Monarch butterfly --> /bird
C: monarch butterfly --> /migrate south
I understand that the argument is invalid but i'd like to confirm if the lawgic done above is correct?