Hello! I'm super interested in joining this server. Please add me!

@ said:

@.anderson I think we had the same version. I also breezed through the first LG, but the second one seemed to trip me up which never happens, so I’m hoping that was experimental too. For your second one was it fencing, political sides, movie genres & one other im blanking on? I for some reason took so long on the movie genres I ended up having to guess on a couple :(

Yes!! Those were the exact games on my second section. I am also totally blanking on the last game I had almost no time left for it and could pretty much only set up my board and a couple inferences before guessing my way through it. 😂

It feels nice to know someone else is in the same boat as I am hoping the first section was real. 🥲

@ said:

Hello just trying to figure out which LR I had was experimental :P

Some people mentioned that there wasn't a monkey token question but then people who took the test on other days said that there were.. & people are also mentioning a Norway/Sweden question but I don't remember seeing that question >( Probably because there is more than test form in use as people have pointed for RC/LG(/p)

But can anyone who just had one LR section tell me if they recognize questions about roast chicken vs. fresh chicken, monkey tokens, and revolutionary political movements?

I only had one LR section and I recognize all three of those questions!

I'm seeing a lot of people wondering which of their RC sections were real and these were the RC questions I got (I only had one RC section):

Nigerian novel

Cacao virus

EMF litigation

Privatization

@ said:

@ said:

I was PRAYING it wouldn't happen, but the LSAT gods bestowed upon me two LG sections.

LG-RC-LR-LG

(First LG included movies and the theatres they're played at in a festival; second LG included movies and their genres in a movie night. It could have been books? I can't remember which--I do remember genres.)

I am really hoping the second LG section was experimental, because I had quite a bit of trouble with that one. I breezed through the first and feel so much more confident with that set.

LR seemed straightforward, RC had some DENSE language I had to parse through. I had much less leftover time at the end than I am used to.

Wishing you all happy testing! (And anyone who feels like they know which LG section was experimental, pls save ya girl some time agonizing wondering which one it was.)

It seems like the one that had fencing students and political parties/candidates was real. This seems like it was the easier of the two for most people.

So I've been reading through a few of the comments and if what you're saying is true, that would be AMAZING, because I do remember the political parties / candidates being an easier game in my first LG section.

But I am also seeing that some people had a brutal "security guard" question which I don't remember at all. If political parties / candidates is real, I'm stoked because I clearly remember that section being much, much easier.

I was PRAYING it wouldn't happen, but the LSAT gods bestowed upon me two LG sections.

LG-RC-LR-LG

(First LG included movies and the theatres they're played at in a festival; second LG included movies and their genres in a movie night. It could have been books? I can't remember which--I do remember genres.)

I am really hoping the second LG section was experimental, because I had quite a bit of trouble with that one. I breezed through the first and feel so much more confident with that set.

LR seemed straightforward, RC had some DENSE language I had to parse through. I had much less leftover time at the end than I am used to.

Wishing you all happy testing! (And anyone who feels like they know which LG section was experimental, pls save ya girl some time agonizing wondering which one it was.)

I didn't get aaaany of my games from discussion here. Which is fine! It comforts me to know the games people are talking about being somewhat manageable weren't on my test, because most of my games I needed to make some quick guesses and inferences were not incredibly obvious at all.

Thank you for this artful post it actually motivated me to study (3(/p)