Hello everyone! I was curious about using IF/Every with negations. I understand that you essentially negate the necessary variable in the sentence and move on ward (These are the quiz's im talking about https://classic.7sage.com/lesson/quiz-negation-4-answers/ Q.2). My question is that when we look at every as a sufficient in group one, we never had a negation attached to it. When do I know to negate the premise after every and when do I know to take it face value as in previous lessons? Unless I missed it, we were never taught why we are suddenly not taking every at face value as the sufficient and leaving it at that?
PT Questions
austinmatias11375
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
austinmatias11375
Saturday, Apr 18 2020
It's notable here to see that E says the conclusion follows the premise, when it doesn't!
austinmatias11375
Tuesday, Apr 07 2020
I think the easiest way to look at this is that the average was 1 in every 5, and that didn't happen, so there was an INCREASED chance of the phenomenon happening. B says that there was a 1 in 10 chance, it didn't so the chances of it happening are also INCREASED.
I'm gonna have to agree with you on this, my issue is that if you use flints for every day chores they probably don't get polished, they probably get worn down. Even if I have a shiny goblet for a center piece in my church is that not a religious artifact, not just some aesthetic reasoning? I feel like this is one of those, one answer is stronger than the other. The other issue is that we don't even know that the flints are polished on the correct ac.