I am coming back here after the NA section. Can anyone provide some examples of what a correct answer might be if this were an NA question as opposed to an SA question?

In these two examples, are we treating the "either/or" as an inclusive or? To me, you would read these two as an exclusive or, but the way we are treating the "lawgic" translation in the video makes it seem like inclusive.

For the first example one, I would think it is exclusive so either the resident has the right to keep a pet or they have not kept the pet openly and notoriously, but not both. This I translated to R → OpNo (if you have the right to keep a pet → you have kept the pet openly) and /OpNo → /R, but in the video it is the opposite. Is this because we are treating the "either/or" as inclusive?