Ngl, I'm somewhat bitter that this lesson wasn't here from the start when I was learning SA months ago, but better late than never. Love to see 7sage constantly improving.
Again, I've said this before: the "time" on these lessons needs to be changed. It absolutely does not take 4 minutes to read, take notes on, and absorb.
It makes a big deal to some and not such a big deal to others. I can tell you the timing estimation in some later lessons, like Parallel Arguments, is much better estimated. When there are a certain amount of hours that the study schedule says to do for a week, I plan out that time in my week. Being overburdened because those "couple minutes" add up over 100+ lessons a week suck. Often, these text-only lessons are off by a factor of 2-4x for me. Sorry that I express my thoughts on the platform, like they tell us to, by giving feedback.
@ColinErickson I agree with you. I put 1 to 2 hours on my study plan because was impossible to follow the 4 hours plan. I was always behind and it was making me crazy!
#feedback This lesson did not unlock/appear until I got to the parallel reasoning section. I struggled alot with SA because of missing this. I believe this is an error in the system
Rather than an error in the system, this lesson seems to be a new addition to the curriculum. I've noticed that they're constantly updating the curriculum, like creating new videos, adding extra exercises and cheat sheets, etc.
Okay, I kinda already know this section will be my mortal enermy! As soon as he gives 2 examples" If there’s an outbreak of a virus that turns people into zombies, we should stock up on canned food." and the "If there’s an outbreak of any kind of virus, we should stock up on canned food.", I immediately thought, I mean what if the "any kind" is not the Zombie kind, so why do I care? and that's why I am wronggggg!
I am coming back here after the NA section. Can anyone provide some examples of what a correct answer might be if this were an NA question as opposed to an SA question?
23 comments
I already know this category is going to wreck me
#feedback is there a list of example sufficient assumption question stems? similar to the ones for the other question types
@janerosebishop bump #feedback
@janerosebishop https://coda.io/d/7Sage-LSATs-LR-Cheat-Sheet_di5c3yhdxZY/7Sage-LSAT-LR-Cheat-Sheet_sug4mZW-?utm_campaign=embed&utm_medium=web&utm_source=i5c3yhdxZY#LR-Cheat-Sheet_tuUrFhBi/r12
I want to cry hahaha this section is going to bury me 6 feet underground \
Ngl, I'm somewhat bitter that this lesson wasn't here from the start when I was learning SA months ago, but better late than never. Love to see 7sage constantly improving.
#feedback No video?
Again, I've said this before: the "time" on these lessons needs to be changed. It absolutely does not take 4 minutes to read, take notes on, and absorb.
a couple mins off in the timing estimation isnt a big deal. no more whining :)
.
It makes a big deal to some and not such a big deal to others. I can tell you the timing estimation in some later lessons, like Parallel Arguments, is much better estimated. When there are a certain amount of hours that the study schedule says to do for a week, I plan out that time in my week. Being overburdened because those "couple minutes" add up over 100+ lessons a week suck. Often, these text-only lessons are off by a factor of 2-4x for me. Sorry that I express my thoughts on the platform, like they tell us to, by giving feedback.
@ColinErickson I agree with you. I put 1 to 2 hours on my study plan because was impossible to follow the 4 hours plan. I was always behind and it was making me crazy!
#feedback This lesson did not unlock/appear until I got to the parallel reasoning section. I struggled alot with SA because of missing this. I believe this is an error in the system
Rather than an error in the system, this lesson seems to be a new addition to the curriculum. I've noticed that they're constantly updating the curriculum, like creating new videos, adding extra exercises and cheat sheets, etc.
VIDEO???
no video for you
/Video ----> You
you --> /video
@Plasticjesus /You ---> Video???
In short: Pick the answer that GUARANTEES the conclusion.
Hmm. Seems interesting.
damn. I know for a fact theres gonna be subjective answers, but we gotta pick the one the writers chose
Okay, I kinda already know this section will be my mortal enermy! As soon as he gives 2 examples" If there’s an outbreak of a virus that turns people into zombies, we should stock up on canned food." and the "If there’s an outbreak of any kind of virus, we should stock up on canned food.", I immediately thought, I mean what if the "any kind" is not the Zombie kind, so why do I care? and that's why I am wronggggg!
I am coming back here after the NA section. Can anyone provide some examples of what a correct answer might be if this were an NA question as opposed to an SA question?