I am coming back here after the NA section. Can anyone provide some examples of what a correct answer might be if this were an NA question as opposed to an SA question?
Ngl, I'm somewhat bitter that this lesson wasn't here from the start when I was learning SA months ago, but better late than never. Love to see 7sage constantly improving.
Again, I've said this before: the "time" on these lessons needs to be changed. It absolutely does not take 4 minutes to read, take notes on, and absorb.
It makes a big deal to some and not such a big deal to others. I can tell you the timing estimation in some later lessons, like Parallel Arguments, is much better estimated. When there are a certain amount of hours that the study schedule says to do for a week, I plan out that time in my week. Being overburdened because those "couple minutes" add up over 100+ lessons a week suck. Often, these text-only lessons are off by a factor of 2-4x for me. Sorry that I express my thoughts on the platform, like they tell us to, by giving feedback.
@ColinErickson I agree with you. I put 1 to 2 hours on my study plan because was impossible to follow the 4 hours plan. I was always behind and it was making me crazy!
#feedback This lesson did not unlock/appear until I got to the parallel reasoning section. I struggled alot with SA because of missing this. I believe this is an error in the system
Rather than an error in the system, this lesson seems to be a new addition to the curriculum. I've noticed that they're constantly updating the curriculum, like creating new videos, adding extra exercises and cheat sheets, etc.
21 comments
Hmm. Seems interesting.
damn. I know for a fact theres gonna be subjective answers, but we gotta pick the one the writers chose
I want to cry hahaha this section is going to bury me 6 feet underground \
I already know this category is going to wreck me
#feedback is there a list of example sufficient assumption question stems? similar to the ones for the other question types
@janerosebishop bump #feedback
@janerosebishop https://coda.io/d/7Sage-LSATs-LR-Cheat-Sheet_di5c3yhdxZY/7Sage-LSAT-LR-Cheat-Sheet_sug4mZW-?utm_campaign=embed&utm_medium=web&utm_source=i5c3yhdxZY#LR-Cheat-Sheet_tuUrFhBi/r12
VIDEO???
no video for you
/Video ----> You
you --> /video
@Plasticjesus /You ---> Video???
I am coming back here after the NA section. Can anyone provide some examples of what a correct answer might be if this were an NA question as opposed to an SA question?
Ngl, I'm somewhat bitter that this lesson wasn't here from the start when I was learning SA months ago, but better late than never. Love to see 7sage constantly improving.
#feedback No video?
Again, I've said this before: the "time" on these lessons needs to be changed. It absolutely does not take 4 minutes to read, take notes on, and absorb.
a couple mins off in the timing estimation isnt a big deal. no more whining :)
It makes a big deal to some and not such a big deal to others. I can tell you the timing estimation in some later lessons, like Parallel Arguments, is much better estimated. When there are a certain amount of hours that the study schedule says to do for a week, I plan out that time in my week. Being overburdened because those "couple minutes" add up over 100+ lessons a week suck. Often, these text-only lessons are off by a factor of 2-4x for me. Sorry that I express my thoughts on the platform, like they tell us to, by giving feedback.
.
@ColinErickson I agree with you. I put 1 to 2 hours on my study plan because was impossible to follow the 4 hours plan. I was always behind and it was making me crazy!
#feedback This lesson did not unlock/appear until I got to the parallel reasoning section. I struggled alot with SA because of missing this. I believe this is an error in the system
Rather than an error in the system, this lesson seems to be a new addition to the curriculum. I've noticed that they're constantly updating the curriculum, like creating new videos, adding extra exercises and cheat sheets, etc.