User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
PrepTests ·
PT139.S4.Q14
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Monday, Mar 31

weird

PrepTests ·
PT130.S3.Q19
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Friday, Jan 31

Very good question

PrepTests ·
PT149.S1.Q12
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Tuesday, Apr 29

The flaw here was so damn easy to spot but it took me forever to figure out what AC matched up. Got it through POE. So frustrating.

PrepTests ·
PT130.S1.Q5
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Wednesday, Jan 29

A was by far the best answer, but god that "many" in A was so suspect lol.

PrepTests ·
PT144.S2.Q24
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Friday, Mar 28

This is so difficult on so many levels. What a question. Probably the hardest NA question i have seen thus far.

PrepTests ·
PT149.S1.Q23
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Monday, Apr 28

Brutal question

PrepTests ·
PT137.S3.Q24
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Friday, Feb 28

How are we inferring /successful from that conclusion? #feedback

PrepTests ·
PT137.S2.Q19
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Thursday, Feb 27

I think the bigger problem with E is that Ordinance 304 is not a subset of some broader regulation. For B, Ordinance 304 is a subset of "legal restrictions". For the stimulus itself, the G survey is a subset of RT projects. Hence, B matches the overall structure better.

Also, the use of "should" in the opening sentence for E is another red flag.

PrepTests ·
PT144.S4.Q21
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Wednesday, Mar 26

"many" and "subsequently" really got me. I did not like B but still chose it. Lesson learned on relying too heavily on these indicator words.

PrepTests ·
PT139.S3.P2.Q12
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Wednesday, Feb 26

12 C is seriously one of the best trap answers I have ever seen.

PrepTests ·
PT136.S4.Q23
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Tuesday, Feb 25

Uhhhh "often" does not mean "most" what? If there were 10,000 shrimp farms, and in 4,000 of them quick and easy profits were made, that would seem to qualify as "often" but not "most." I feel pretty strongly that Jolene does not have an answer for this, much less a definitive "no" to juxtapose with Alex's obvious "yes." The word "often" seems too weak here, much the same way "hardly ever" is too strong in C. This question's difficulty (like many 5 stars) seems to come from ambiguous wording in the answer choices. #feedback

User Avatar

Thursday, Aug 22 2024

babachanianaren905

Drilling Full Sections without using a PT

Hi,

I'm wondering how I would go about drilling a full section of LR/RC without using a preptest. This answer has been answered a couple of years ago and it seems like the method/UI has since changed on 7sage. Would I just up the drill size to 25? Would that give me an accurate distributions of 1-5star questions? Need some #feedback #help

PrepTests ·
PT148.S3.Q16
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Tuesday, Apr 22

Got this right but idk if E is actually descriptively wrong. D is the clear flaw. E is not the flaw that the argument makes (accessibility), but it does seem reasonable to interpret E as saying something like "because the Mona Lisa and every other great art exist COLLECTIVELY (which cover all bases of aesthetic fulfillment possible) any new art that is made is affected by this fact (affected is super weak too so we don't even know which direction we're being affected in)." I don't think that this is an unreasonable interpretation of E. Maybe I'm looking too much into it, but idk, it seems like JY's interpretation is a little too shallow. Regardless, D is the clear cut flaw.

PrepTests ·
PT129.S1.Q14
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Tuesday, Jan 21

If D had said something like, "legislators presented with polemical legislation do not consider the consequences the legislation had", it would still be NA right? The repugnance/enthusiasm bit seems like it just carries over (all As into the B bucket). #feedback

PrepTests ·
PT129.S1.Q11
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Tuesday, Jan 21

Would another reason why A is wrong from Cynthia's POV be because "pure theoretical research" may or may not seek to advance our "theoretical knowledge of nature"? #feedback

PrepTests ·
PT138.S2.Q16
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Tuesday, Mar 18

Amazing explanation

PrepTests ·
PT142.S2.Q16
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Monday, Mar 17

.

PrepTests ·
PT142.S1.Q17
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Saturday, Mar 15

What a terrible argument lmaooooo

PrepTests ·
PT136.S2.Q12
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Saturday, Feb 15

.

PrepTests ·
PT136.S2.Q12
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Saturday, Feb 15

All these answers are trash

PrepTests ·
PT139.S2.P1.Q2
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Friday, Feb 14

Brutal first passage

PrepTests ·
PT138.S1.P2.Q14
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Wednesday, Feb 12

14 is brutal gahdamn

PrepTests ·
PT148.S4.Q11
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Friday, Apr 11

I actually don't think that A is necessarily a flaw. The argument is not concluding that the students must prefer Hall Dining. Eliminating the other garbage answer choices is your best friend here.

PrepTests ·
PT148.S1.Q16
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Wednesday, Apr 09

I'm HIM

PrepTests ·
PT148.S1.Q24
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Wednesday, Apr 09

An easy way to internalize the logic is by understanding that you can't draw a conclusion on the subset because we don't know the size of the superset. The stim and only E do this. For E, there may be 500% more shopping malls in /REH, hence we can't conclude that our mall will probably turn us into a REH, as we do not know the size of the shopping malls set outside of REH.

A is a pretty good argument because we know the size of the set--major malls (city) is the largest bound, hence we can conclude that because most of this set are REH, it is probable that the next one would be a REH in the future.

PrepTests ·
PT140.S2.Q15
User Avatar
babachanianaren905
Wednesday, Mar 05

Lmao this question sucks...I'm supposed to determine whether or not compensating victims is justified? What if all the victims stole that money first? Or are murderers? Or kick puppies? Is giving back money still justified or should their bad karma win out? Answer choices are supposed to stand on their own for certain LR questions, but LSAC doesn't have to play by those same rules? This question is trash. Please somebody prove me wrong #feedback

Confirm action

Are you sure?