User Avatar
berthstefan671
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
berthstefan671
Thursday, Aug 31 2017

Thanks for the input everyone. I'm leaning towards pushing back now. Gonna do my best up until week of though to make sure. To clarify, a "cancellation" means sitting for the test and cancelling afterward--not simply deciding not to take beforehand, correct?

User Avatar

Thursday, Aug 31 2017

berthstefan671

September vs December LSAT

Hey yall (from Texas),

I am registered for the September LSAT, but I am wondering what yall think about pushing

I am doing 0 LG and -1 to -3 on RC. However, for LR I range from 0/-1 to -5/-6 but usually -3 each section. Therefore, I am ranging from 168 to 174ish. The variance I mostly attribute to time on LR. I get done with my round 1 with only about 2 minutes usually. My blind review is almost always 176-178, and I don't see any major trends as far as missing question types. My thesis is that I have the fundamentals--my variance is due to speed.

However, I have been out of school for four years now, so I work all day and then come home and study. I don't feel like I have the time necessary to get more time on LR sections before the September test to get more consistency on each LR section. I am most concerned about the range I am seeing. I know I am fully capable of mid 170s (and I don't see the point of pushing up into my theoretical maximum). BUT I don't want to score in the 160s just because I went too slow on one LR section or had a bad day.

I always hear it is better to apply earlier rather than later for T14 schools because of scholarships. However, would it be better for me to foolproof LR and get a 173ish in December or have a bad day and get a 168ish in December??

Also, tips on improving speed? I am already videoing my LR takes. A friend recommended using an interval timer and doing questions from the question bank at a level 1 difficulty in under 40 seconds, level 2 50 seconds, level 3 65 seconds, level 4/5: 80 seconds but then forcing myself to skip if I take longer than the limit to train myself to take the appropriate amount of time on each question difficulty type. Thoughts?

User Avatar
berthstefan671
Saturday, Mar 10 2018

Thanks everyone.

@ I studied about four hours everyday and took two PTs a week after the cc was finished.

@ yes I took December. Submitted my application before New year's. Complete on 1/4.

@ I already did!

User Avatar

Thursday, Mar 08 2018

berthstefan671

THANKS, JY, 7Sage + Everyone!

Thanks, 7sage! I was recently admitted to a T-14 with a full ride plus stipend after I improved from my diagnostic of 155 to a 174 after a full year of studying. That literally makes 7Sage the best investment I have ever made!!

I have been out of undergrad for five years now working in elementary school. I currently serve as an instructional coach, which basically means I teach teachers to teach. I strongly endorse JY and 7sage's course of study for the LSAT. First, let me say that JY is hilarious--I literally would cry laughing during his video explanations sometimes. Humor is not sufficient or necessary for quality teaching, but quality teaching is always necessarily enhanced with comedy. Second, JY breaks the logic, grammar, and arguments into their essential component parts--allowing students to master the underlying concepts. Each concept is scaffolded on to the next concept so you can easily build an amazing, LSAT-destroying brain machine. Often, JY breaks difficult questions or logic ideas into visual schematics to help students process the information. When you are an LSAT beginner, this is a life-saver. Third, because the videos and work are online you can work through it at your own pace. Don't understand something? Slow down the video and watch it again. Need to review causation? Loop back to that in the core curriculum. Also, the ability to slow down and speed up videos is a life-saver, helping your breeze through question and games review videos to find the information most pertinent to your misunderstandings. Fourth, 7Sage keeps data for you after taking your PrepTests, allowing you to target the most high leverage concepts with a razor sharp scalpel. Further, this data allows you as a learner to become the driver of your own learning. Fifth, the fool-proofing and blind-review methods allow you to improve on your own mistakes through reflection--the hallmark of good learning. Not only that, they allow you to practice a sufficient amount with the concepts that are actually difficult for you so that you improve in skill. Sixth, the sorting of questions, games, and passages with tags allows you to find the relevant practice types you need and to address them easily. Seventh, this program opens up access to all learners who have internal motivation. When doing 7Sage, I sometimes get scared that it is going to make the tests harder over time as more and more people learn how to do destroy this test. Also, let's be honest, 7Sage is hella cheap. Comparable in person services--even the low quality ones--are way more expensive. As a side-note, the fact that the logic game videos are free is the best marketing tactic ever. I always smiled to myself when JY deftly placed an ad for the core curriculum into each one of the logic games videos ("if you don't know this (insert concept X), you really should review it in our core curriculum lessons"). Eighth, 7Sage is flexible. Not only has 7sage worked well with my schedule allowing me to spend heavy hours when I had them available and to skimp when my workload was extra heavy. Ninth, 7sage mimics the social environment of a live classroom with its awesome community. We know that learning is enhanced through social interactions, and the community here--the webinar videos, the discussion forums, the message boards after each lesson--do just that. Honestly, I should have been better at utilizing the community as a resource, but just being able to look up different user's responses to questions and seeing their writing helped me grow myself. Without the webinars and videos of JY/others taking their tests, I would not have learned efficient timing and skipping strategies for pushing myself into the 170s. The whole idea of "rounds" for LR was foreign to me. I used to just try and finish questions 25/26 exactly at the end of 35 minutes (can't believe I ever did this).

All in all, I appreciate everything and will be posting this on the reviews so other people can find this god-send course.

User Avatar
berthstefan671
Wednesday, Mar 07 2018

When is it OK for public officials such as Kellye Testy to lie to us? Normally this would be anathema to a community. However, there may be some cases where it is beneficial. If only I had read about some type of test to determine when it is in the public interest at some point in my life...

User Avatar
berthstefan671
Wednesday, Mar 07 2018

Also this: http://hls.harvard.edu/dept/ocs/prospective-students/recommended-reading/

User Avatar
berthstefan671
Wednesday, Mar 07 2018

I have enjoyed reading 1L of a ride, 1L the novel, Getting to Maybe, and Letters to a Young Lawyer.

PrepTests ·
PT137.S3.Q18
User Avatar
berthstefan671
Monday, Sep 04 2017

"Catapults you out of the car." Classic JY.

User Avatar
berthstefan671
Saturday, Dec 02 2017

I had RC real, LR25 (Mayors), LG, RC experimental, and LR26.

I usually do -0/1 LR each, -0 LG, and -4 RC, but I am sure I reversed LG with RC on this test. The subway game really slowed me down, so I didn't have enough time to finish the apartments game. I was really sad when I opened section 4 and saw RC. I was hoping the apartments game was experimental.

All in all, I felt like I underperformed because of not knocking LG out. But I think the easy RC compensates for harder LG making the curve come out to a normal -10 or -11 for 170. Anyone feel similarly about the likelihood of curve getting evened out by easier RC?

User Avatar
berthstefan671
Friday, Dec 01 2017

PT 36 S4 Game 3

Confirm action

Are you sure?