I was reading a book about logical reasoning and the author made a point that the stimulus is just bad writing, purposely to make it difficult for us :/

Would the valid argument be: Most violinists at the NY Philharmonic know to play the violin. All people who know how to play violin are not exceptionally good at playing. Therefore, some (or all?) NY Philharmonic violinists are not exceptionally good at playing.

The rule is if it's a bird then it has to be be migrating south. The rule doesn't say anything about it being only birds are migrating south. So that denies the fact that a monarch butterfly does not migrate South. We don't know if more animals migrate South, only birds, so its invalid to draw the conclusion about monarch butterflies or anything other non-bird animals.

The title of this lesson literally contradicts the previous lesson. Would make more sense to say Exception or Implicit Exclusion

Some = sum hahahaaha

I WILL SCORE IN THE 170s!!!!!!!!!!