Man, I got tripped up on question 3 because I thought 'substantive accuracy' sounded sketchy and assumed 'selectivity' meant selectivity towards the facts.... GODDAMN IT LSAT EVERY TIME...

bruh that PT must be from 2042 how would i know

man this one was a pain

I think for A the lack of feedback can be considered as a form of feedback itself (what do these dumbass male guppies know anyways). Assuming that these male guppies were those that were showing off their orange side more in reaction to the female guppy (who is then removed), them not showing their orange sides to the dummy guppy is more evidence that guppies change behaviour in accordance to feedback they receive from 'females'

So the only questions that I got wrong were the argument part questions (which I have no idea look like as of now) and the pseudo-sufficient assumption ones, of which I mistakenly labelled most of them as strengthening stems.

It seems though, that the PSA stems are easily distinguishable because of their characteristic inclusion of the word 'principle'. Other than that, the wording used in str and psa stems "most supports, most helps to justify the reasoning" etc, seem almost indistinguishable. Can anyone tell me what really marks a PSA from a strengthening stem?

feel physically inadequate and accumulate hearing loss LMAO im done

anyone else just use charts? for weight/pop to increase weight over time would have to be either 1) flat/fall or fall/fall faster

#help (Added by Admin)

I got this wrong my first time and chose B over D.

But as soon as you hone in on Beckstein's use of "no student", you can eliminate B because Beckstein isn't arguing that only people who speak ASL should be prohibited from taking it to fulfill their requirements, all students should.

'possible' is a cursed word in the LSAT

ya got me LSAT! ya got me

that green blob scared the shit out of me

happened to me too! got booted 6 or 7 times from my exam, the last time for ~10 minutes.

Interested!

last q was axed brah

Hmm. I feel like I had more simply reasoning in coming to my answer. Can someone evaluate my reasoning and tell me if it is in fact a more elegant reasoning path or just more convoluted?

PT S2 Q16

Turns on harm.

A. I put A, but its a trap. The argument of the author of the permissability of drugs does not turn on integrity or anything like that. It is about HARM. So even if this is true, it is irrelevant to the argument, therefore neither strengthens nor weakens it.

B. I will reject this on the basis that it focusses on the qualifer of the PURIST, not the argument of the author.

C. So? What does this have to do with drugs?

D. Again, what does this have to do with drugs?

E. Yes. If the author's test is harm, and his argument is that they are permissable because vitamins and aspirin do not HARM, then evidence that they indeed MAY harm weakens the author's argument and it must be qualified now somehow. For instance, saying that they should no tbe prohibited UNDER CERTAIN CONCESSIOSN.

happened to me too - especially for LR. I think somewhere around the late 70's range the writers just get way more creative with coming up with flawed arguments that just arent intuitive i.e. check out some of 'flaw' questions deep into the sections in the 80's and craft stims/AC's that penalize you for deferring to question type specific strategies

this is such a BS question lmao

in all seriousness-- I was actually initially caught between B and D (although now I know why D is wrong), because B requires us to assume that the force of the comets are strong enough to pull Neptune.

I mean JY subconsciously does it himself in this video (very-- er with a powerful gravitational pull).

Powerful gravitational pull? How the hell are we supposed to know if this is powerful enough to pull a goddamn PLANET? Just seems that in any other question we'd have seismic tossed this answer choice into the ground because it makes us assume things.

im the one tuggin bruh

I hesitated to choose E because though it does address the reported vs reality issue in the stim, it doesnt (as the fellow below me pointed out) address the part of why the surveys are giving the impression that total number of crimes have decreased. equating this for people feeling safer, as JY does in the vid, is a bit lazy I think. At the end of the day it is a 'most supports' type Q, so even though answeer choice E isnt perfect its the best of the bunch.