For question #3: I'm wondering if the following two statements are logically equivalent?

1) op-comp and /funding → most popop

2) op-comp and /most popop → funding

Do these two statements have the same meaning?

For question #2:

I initially ignored the condition "whose economies rely predominantly on trade" - why is this not a condition I can assume will be satisfied and kick up to the domain along with "Kingdoms in Westeros?"

Is it incorrect to think of the domain as similar to modifiers?

For question #4:

If there is (paraphrased) "no statistical evidence provided to show that humans act selfishly more often than they act unselfishly", how can we say the winner of the comparison is that humans act selfishly? Is it not that they have no evidence to show this? Meaning we cannot say with any certainty at all whether or not humans act more or less selfishly. I guess ultimately it feels like claiming that humans act selfishly as the winner is based on some unstated assumption that I'm not sure is entirely reasonable to assume??

Why is discover not the main verb? How do you determine that it's helped?

#feedback It would be pretty cool if we could highlight/underline the text in these lessons!

If I watch this whole video, despite my brain being fried from the prior lessons, Brad is awesome. I watched the whole video. What is the valid conclusion that can be drawn from this argument?

Seriously, though, Brad is awesome. Such an inspiration!!!