Self-study
For example with RC I want to make the passages more difficult (it is giving me like difficulty 3 and below). How do I change that?
bob247hammer
- Joined
- Jan 2026
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
Goal score: 170
CAS GPA
3.8
1L START YEAR
2027
Discussions
bob247hammer
Wednesday, May 13
Thumbs up this if I am thinking through this correctly! Excuse my typos. Correct AC (E): If public figures can have good reputations, then they can have bad reputations. Therefore, if they cannot have bad reps, then they also cannot have good ones. This bridges the gap between the argument. The premise is that no one will say anything bad about public figires, and because of that the conclusion is that strong laws make it so nobody can have a good rep. If public figures can only have a good rep if there are people with bad reps, and the premise states that nobody will say anything bad (meaning no bad rep), then it is impossible for anyone to have a good rep. This rule perfectly bridges the gap.
bob247hammer
Monday, May 11
i read D as the argument presumes that the government will not be the one reporting the data, bc if the government is reporting the data, and not the airlines, then the airlines cannot give incomplete reports (and the government can give complete reports to ensure the public being fully informed). I understand why A is correct, i just really thought that the argument was vulnerable to the fact that it assumes that the airlines will be the ones with the power when the government is the regulator. Can anyone help me explain why this is not the case?
bob247hammer
Tuesday, Apr 28
Got it right when I visited it twice and took 4 minutes lol but the right ideas were there! Accuracy > timing, the timing will come.
bob247hammer
Wednesday, Apr 22
Genuine question when people solve this are they diagramming or are they doing this in their head?
bob247hammer
Wednesday, Apr 15
This question, and C and D, annoy me. I thought that C was too good to be true, and that it would end up not weakening (therefore being the right answer) bc even though there are more accountants making it more likely that it is an accountant and not an actuary, it COULD still be possible that there was an outlier actuary that did it. I overthought for sure. Looking at it knowing what the correct AC is, I do UNDERSTAND why C would weaken the argument bc there are less actuaries, making it more likely that it was an accountant, thus weakening the main conclusion that it was an actuary. However, I feel like with this test we are constantly taught that there can be outliers and numbers dont always guarantee things. If a tutor could try and make this make more sense to me, I would appreciate it. Like i DO get it, im just like ugh.
bob247hammer
Wednesday, Apr 15
please comment or upvote me if I am thinking these through correctly, THANKS:
AC E: Chang does not disagree with Wirth that one single gene is not responsible for predisposing ppl to manic- depression. He agrees with this conclusion. However, where Chang DOES disagree is that there is no possible way of ppl being genetically pre-disposed. Chang argues that there are other ways ppl could be, such as by having a combo of several genes.
AC D: Wirths argument does not disallow any evidence. He does not take evidence, for example, that would support the idea of multiple genes creating a pre-disposition and rejects that evidence. He simply takes the evidence that he has and makes a conclusion on the larger issue based off that one piece of evidence.
bob247hammer
Wednesday, Apr 15
I understand why the correct AC is C , however I am confused because are we not supposed to take the premises of the argument as true? Therefore, it is TRUE what the art critic is saying and that we cannot challenge the premise that "judgments about the quality of the work can only be a matter of taste."
bob247hammer
Edited Tuesday, Apr 7
Can a tutor explain to me in simple terms why B is wrong? I was between A and B and picked A first time, then B in BR. I understand why A is correct, I just more so do not understand why B is fully wrong. is it because insolvency is referenced in the passage as being damaging to society and the social contract and not the economy?
bob247hammer
Thursday, Mar 26
I’m pretty sure you have to pay for CAS first to add a recommender regardless of when ur applying or whatever. But the letters are valid for 5 years with CAS purchased!
bob247hammer
Tuesday, Mar 3
I have watched both explanation videos and im honestly still confused how AC A is wrong. I feel like most people sending roses when they send flowers ties into the idea of people not caring to please the receiver when they send something, because even if they know that someone prefers one thing to another they still send the thing they just send usually. Can a tutor plz help explain? I am confused.
man idk how taxes work tf