For example with RC I want to make the passages more difficult (it is giving me like difficulty 3 and below). How do I change that?
- Joined
- Jan 2026
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
please comment or upvote me if I am thinking these through correctly, THANKS:
AC E: Chang does not disagree with Wirth that one single gene is not responsible for predisposing ppl to manic- depression. He agrees with this conclusion. However, where Chang DOES disagree is that there is no possible way of ppl being genetically pre-disposed. Chang argues that there are other ways ppl could be, such as by having a combo of several genes.
AC D: Wirths argument does not disallow any evidence. He does not take evidence, for example, that would support the idea of multiple genes creating a pre-disposition and rejects that evidence. He simply takes the evidence that he has and makes a conclusion on the larger issue based off that one piece of evidence.
I understand why the correct AC is C , however I am confused because are we not supposed to take the premises of the argument as true? Therefore, it is TRUE what the art critic is saying and that we cannot challenge the premise that "judgments about the quality of the work can only be a matter of taste."
Can a tutor explain to me in simple terms why B is wrong? I was between A and B and picked A first time, then B in BR. I understand why A is correct, I just more so do not understand why B is fully wrong. is it because insolvency is referenced in the passage as being damaging to society and the social contract and not the economy?
I’m pretty sure you have to pay for CAS first to add a recommender regardless of when ur applying or whatever. But the letters are valid for 5 years with CAS purchased!
I have watched both explanation videos and im honestly still confused how AC A is wrong. I feel like most people sending roses when they send flowers ties into the idea of people not caring to please the receiver when they send something, because even if they know that someone prefers one thing to another they still send the thing they just send usually. Can a tutor plz help explain? I am confused.
This question, and C and D, annoy me. I thought that C was too good to be true, and that it would end up not weakening (therefore being the right answer) bc even though there are more accountants making it more likely that it is an accountant and not an actuary, it COULD still be possible that there was an outlier actuary that did it. I overthought for sure. Looking at it knowing what the correct AC is, I do UNDERSTAND why C would weaken the argument bc there are less actuaries, making it more likely that it was an accountant, thus weakening the main conclusion that it was an actuary. However, I feel like with this test we are constantly taught that there can be outliers and numbers dont always guarantee things. If a tutor could try and make this make more sense to me, I would appreciate it. Like i DO get it, im just like ugh.