This increases speed, but will this method increase understanding as well?

What is suppose to turn gray?

If I have trouble with a game, I redo it every day for 5 days, then I'll come back to it a few weeks later to ensure that I have the 'method of attack,' so to speak, down pack.

By break, I think most of the commenters mean a few days, not just a break after 5 questions

Bonjoursm@.cofc.edu

My diagnostic score was a136. I'm now PTing in the mid 160s.

Take your time with every question; Speed will come to you. Also, burnout is real-- be sure to take a day off (at least) once a week.

Flaw and necessary assumption questions are the ones that I use to miss the most.

Download the Cambridge flawed reasoning packet and just practice each question three or four times. You'll start to see the patterns.

Although I still struggle with level 3/4 necessary assumption questions, I've pretty much conquered the FR questions

I went from a 139 to where I am now (upper 160's) in about 5 months. Keep practicing, you can do it! 150 to 160 was significantly more difficult than 140 to 150. Once you increase your understanding so that you are consistently scoring 160, reaching 165 is a breeze.

I would recommend buying the Cambridge packets and drill each practice set 3 or 4 times. Make sure to write down WHY you believe that the right answer is right and why the wrong ones are wrong (even if it takes an entire day to answer one question). 10 hours a week is sufficient to see improvements, but I highly recommend 15 or more per week.

Congrats!!

I would send your pre-law advisor and her colleagues a copy of the acceptance letter as a slap in the face.

I've always been -2 to -3 on LG. My biggest accomplishment thus far is going from -12 to -14 on each LR to -3 to -5 on each LR.

Hoping to be -0 to -3 soon

UGPA is a 3.5 :(

@ The RC section is my biggest weakness. Currently average -7 to -10; my ADD is possibly my biggest enemy. I was averaging -12 to -15 on RC about a month ago.

Powerscore is a waste. Get manhattan LR or trainer. Or... Just get the Cambridge packets and just run through them 3 or 4 times.

I believe that JY said in one of his videos that 'but' and 'however' usually indicate the conclusion.

I did the same as @.k.vanv

Most schools look at your highest score.

I took the LSAT yesterday. It was my last available take (I have already been admitted into my desired law school).

Anyways, to answer your question, they seem to be no more difficult than most other recent tests (60 and up). I had two LG sections, the real one had two grouping games and two sequencing games. One game in each category had a 'twist.'

[removed]

A 166 is far from a "weak score." You can get into many respectable law schools with that score (some even with $$). For example, My friend, who also earned a 166 was admitted into Emory (19th) with a $60k scholarship.

I think section 1 was the experimental, judging by comments on reddit

What is your current score? A high 150s is obtainable. Just as others have said, keep practicing and blind review every question you have trouble answering (even if it takes you all day to blind review your circled questions). Check out lsathacks.com for simple explanations on tough questions; this website has helped me greatly improve.

Buy each Cambridge packet, drill each level (starting with level 1) two or three times, then move on to the next level.

Have you applied to any schools? A 161 should get you into many good schools, maybe even with a small scholarship, as long as your GPA isn't terrible. Possibly even a top 50 school.

Scored lower than my PT by 5 points. I choked on the games. Will be applying to a few schools of which I have a 60-75% chance of getting into while studying for June

According to reddit, LSAC is closed until 10am due to weather conditions

For $80 you get all of the LR questions from PT1 to 38, which are sorted by question type

Get the Cambridge packets