I am so upset I even got this question wrong just because I was not paying attention.

B is wrong because it is still attacking the second document. What AC B is trying to do is destroy the analogy between fatty foods and cigarettes, they are trying to trap you into thinking that since the analogy is "wrecked" then it follows that governments should continue to prevent the advertisement of cigarettes and even make it illegal to do so.

What are the two statements in conflict?

1. Governments are justified in PREVENTING the advertisement of cigarettes

2. Cigarette advertisement should remain legal.

With resolve reconciles questions, the goal is to find the AC that will say "Actually governments can still prevent the advertisement of cigarettes while still keeping their advertisement legal.

You have to make it so that both arguments/conclusions remain valid and strong.

Not sure if this helps anyone but this is how I was able to understand this question:

Specialists treat people with back injuries either with Drug and Therapy or with therapy alone. We are told that people will have the same outcome with either recommendation. Think about it this way, if someone is involved in a severe motor vehicle accident resulting in a severe back injury their doctor might recommend therapy and drug to maybe release the inflamation. Now think of someone that has a slip and fall, they might have a less severe back injury and might only need massage rather than oxycotone + massage. So, what did we just assume? Well, we assumed that all back injuries are the same rather than the fact that there are various degrees of severity and doctors will recommend the most effective treatment plan depending on the type of injury. Think about if that person that was in a severe car accident was only given therapy alone and no drugs, they might not recover as well as they would have if they had the combination treatment (drugs and therapy) which contradicts the idea that using either treatment plan will yield the same result.

I hope this helps, please let me know if my way of thinking is flawed.

Thank you everyone, this was super helpful!

This was my first LSAT and I panicked and ended up blanking out on the whole test. I am just worried about these school seeing such a low score

I had LG-RC-LR, couldn’t finish the last game and guessed the last 10 questions. RC was brutal and didn’t finish the last passage. LG was normal I think. Writing again in January if anyone wants to creat a study group

@ pray lol!

Oh okay, thank you!

Do i need a law hub account?

I tried to access it but it says it is deleted :/

Is there an experimental?

Hey, love to study with you!

I was able to book my mine! January 19, 2021 10:20

Count me in too!

Might be a little unrelated but how did you improve your RC score to -3?