Hey Guys!! Here is the link to join the group me!! https://groupme.com/join_group/87499408/svIND7A3 @ @-1 @ @ @ @.nizri40 @ @

A- This is incorrect because it almost supports the executive's argument by saying that senior reporters at the newspaper make just as much as competitors, so there isn't shortfall in their salary. It definitely doesn't weaken the argument.

B- I definitely did not pick this out to be the correct choice at first, but now it makes a little sense. I thought about it like an internship. If I am at an unpaid internship, the only reason I am there, and the benefit I am getting is the experience and training, which will contribute to me potentially making more at future jobs. I am starting at the bottom, so that I can make my way up. That is what the executive is implying in their argument. However, AC B is saying that most people have worked there for more than 10 years getting paid the same salary that is below average. Therefore, they have not been compensated by training because they are still at the same job getting underpaid.

C- This is incorrect because it has nothing to do with employee salary or training. It it basically saying the newspaper itself is improving its profits, which might explain why the employees are getting underpaid, but doesn't weaken the argument.

D- This literally has nothing to do with the argument whatsoever.

E- Again, this is just more random information about the newspaper and doesn't even address the argument. If ANYTHING it would support the executive's argument because it could be used to say that the employees are getting good training because they are writing stories for multiple countries.

A- Incorrect because the premise says that "most people who have pets are less happy than most who do not," and this AC uses "some people." This option is too broad because if 8/10 people with pets are less happy than most who do not, that still leaves 2 people who could be more happy, which could be the "some people."

B- This is not relevant because it does not mention happiness whatsoever. Someone could want a pet for protection or many other reasons not related to happiness.

C- The conclusion is that if someone wants to be "as happy as possible," and most pet owner's being reasonably happy does not weaken this because they could still be less happy than people without pets.

D- This is the correct answer choice because it addresses the possibility that pets are not what is causing the unhappiness in people, or saying that just because there is a correlation does not mean there is causation. It is saying that pets actually make people happier, meaning they do not contribute negatively to their unhappiness.

E- This really says nothing because people with pets also could be unhappy at times, and it says nothing about what is causing their unhappiness.

For all of my paper/pencil besties... RC KILLED ME

I loveee this!!! I am going to get above a 173 on the August 2022 LSAT!!!

@.yehia @-1 I commented the link to the groupme above so you can join :)

@.g.velez-1 You can apply for it when you apply for any other accommodation like extra time! I have ADHD and working on paper makes maintaining my focus significantly more manageable. So, I just had my psychiatrist attest to that in my accommodation request.

Yes, I believe it will be a scantron (unless you also have the accommodation to put your answers on the test). From what I understood, we will receive more information about the format, rules/regulations, and a tracking number for the shipment as we get closer to the test date. I wish they would tell us sooner lol.