- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
That sucks that they allowed distraction during the test. I took it at Hofstra and it was bad enough that there was a sick girl who kept sneezing right behind me. I couldn't even imagine how much focus I'd lose with actual construction going on.
Them referring to the sub-conclusion as just the conclusion made me iffy of B.. I chose it because the other answers were wrong, but it made me very doubtful
Would you consider this a well-written question?
I use to struggle immensely with RC, mainly because I would find myself not paying enough attention. I used JY's advice and pretended to be interested in the reading, as in wondering why things happened in the reading, what may come up next, as if I was reading something for pleasure/entertainment.
Another weird thing I started doing was sort of using a loud "inside my head" voice when reading, sort of like I'm shouting the words to myself. It helped me put emphasis on every word and prevents me from dozing off or letting my mind wander.
Am I the only one who didn't know what "verbosity" or "economy of expression" meant?
Does the "100%" mean that no one got this question wrong? lol
I chose A, but for answer B you have to make a lot of assumptions for it to explain why the discrepancy occurred.
The reason C looks attractive is because the stimulus states how the antidote is very effective at limiting the duration and severity of chicken pox. This means that the person will appear to be healed more quickly, yet still be able to infect people, so it is dangerous in the sense that it could disguise the disease.
How would anyone be able to know which one was experimental? What traits gives it away?