Subscription pricing
People's political behavior frequently does not match their rhetoric. ████████ ████ ████████ █████ ██████████ ████████████ ██ █████ ██████ ████ ████ ███ ██ ███████ ████████ ████████████ ███ █ ████████████ ████████ ████████ ███████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ ████ █████ ███████████ ███████ ███████ ██████ █████ ██████ █████ ███████ ███████████ █████ ████████ ████ ███████
Summarize Argument
The author tells us that what people say about politics often contradicts their political behavior. The argument defines these concepts: what people say is that they want less government intervention, but what they do is vote out inactive politicians. The author tells us that what politicians do is pass laws that intervene in voters’ lives. We then get a sub-conclusion: “voters often reelect politicians whose behavior they resent,” meaning that people vote for active politicians who interfere with their lives, which they don’t like. This all supports the claim that people’s political talk and behavior differ.
Identify Argument Part
The claim that people tend not to reelect inactive politicians is a factual premise that supports a sub-conclusion (that voters reelect politicians they resent), which in turn supports the main conclusion.
14.
Which one of the following ████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ████ ██████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ██████ ████ ███ ██ ███████ ████████ ████████████
a
It describes a ██████████ ███ █████ ███ ██████████ ██████████ ██ ███████ ██ ██ ████████████
b
It is a ███████ ███████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ██████████ ████ ██████ █████ ███████ ███████████ █████ ████████ ████ ███████
c
It is offered ██ ██ ███████ ██ ███ █ ████████████ ████████ ████████ ███████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ ████ █████ ███████████ ██████████ ████ ███████ ██████
d
It is a ██████████████ █████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ██████ ████████ █████ ██████████ ████████████ ██ █████ ██████
e
It is cited ██ ████████ ████ ████████ ████████ █████ ███████ █████ █████████ ████████