Nice post! I'm going to try your strategy!
The same thing always happened to me using Chrome. Try Firefox, thus far that has not happen.
Personally I think you should just stick to reading the reading comprehension passages from the lsat. Don't make the test more complicated than it already is. But if you want to read political science articles then google the syllabus of different political science teachers at certain schools and that should give you a good idea of what their students are reading.
I agree with TC Merlini. Causation is not the same as formal logic. Causation assumes something caused another simply because they happened at the same time. U shouldn't use arrows to draw out causation. You can use lines though such as C------E to represent cause and effect.
Just keep reviewing prep-tests. I know it sounds redundant but that's probably the best way that you will learn, continue to learn, and be the most efficient way at conquering the material.
YOU NEED BREAKS! I repeat. YOU NEED BREAKS! I started studying for the LSAT May 2013 till December 2013. I took the December 2013 test. Towards the end of my studying I was so over the LSAT because A) I had been studying so long for it and B) I didn't take quality breaks. I did take a break for like a week during June or July but that was really it. You will go crazy if you don't take breaks. Trust me. Not only that this test is demoralizing and can and will take a lot of energy out of you.
Exactly. I've pretty much stayed away from TLS. Although it has tons of useful information, you can start to over analyze and become coocoo.
FAU is a good testing center. They have the regular desks but also the long desks like in a lecture class. But you don't get to pick which room your in so it's basically a guessing game.
I don't think there is a such thing as a "normal range", but if you've taken the LSAT twice already maybe you could switch up your studying technique. 165, 161, 167 isn't bad. Not everyone scores 170+. You could study for the LSAT for a year and never reach 170.
why is answer choice D incorrect? it never states that learning how to manipulate symbols is a part of learning geometry it just says that it enables them. Answer choice D sounds like it is a necessary conditioning in learning geometry.
I literally was shell shocked while taking this pt because I never had the hard passage first in a reading comprehension section. It scared me and just ruined it for me.
Hi I'm looking for a study buddy maybe someone that goes to Florida Atlantic University. I'm good at games and reading comprehension just need help with lr. If your struggling with games or the reading comp I can help you and vice versa. If interested just inbox me thanks.
Certain fields that people would think have highly intelligent people or is a field that requires an extreme amount of knowledge is not what most people think.
It sounds as if your doing perfectly fine on your prep tests. Exactly what is the problem because if your only missing 6 or 7 that puts you in the 170 range?
That used to happen to me all the time try Firefox there's no crashes
Am I the only one that felt the test went by in a blur? It went by so fast that it didn't even feel that I had spent four hours testing. Oh yeah the writing sample was pretty decent.
the rc section was definitely experimental as i had 2 back to back. (LG LR RC RC LR). I thought the games were decent. I was so excited to have the games first. The reading comp I thought I did really well on and I actually liked the one about mirrors. The one that talked about judges and whether certain things should be taxed was weird. Any who, I actually got through everything, and that has NEVER happened on a timed pt. NEVER! I had time to check my RC and LR. But I hope my test scores speak for how I felt during the test which was reallllyy gooooodddd!
"You just read c and just tell c to go die somewhere"........Too funny!!
It's usually harder to see a score increase once you break a certain point.
[edited by Student Services]