- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Could it also be framed as if J then F and negated as if /J and F meaning one does not need to be a Jedi to use the force? or is this wrong to negate the sufficient condition? I believe this may not work because writing /A and B could suggest not A and not B.
Some has no contrapositive so it would work in Logic like so... dog likes bacon. Two lessons ago they said that some and most for intersecting sets do not have contrapositives because they do not make sense. This circumstance is an example of that.
Some but not most could imply or complicate the interpretation by suggesting few could still mean more than 50% depending on the context, which we know is not accurate because the upper boundary of few is 50%. It's easier to say and understand what one means when they say some are but most are not.
What I interpreted it as and this may be incorrect, but when some could be referring to all it depends on the context of the situation. For example, if I were to say some students can read and then I said could it be true that all students in Mr Cooper's class can read the answer can be correct because it depends on the context you are using the word. While some doesn't mean all, we can make it mean all dependent on the context.
Will context ever be present after the argument or conclusion?
I cannot remember for the life of me what POE stands for and after looking it up, I'm still lost. Someone, please let me know.