have you considered a session of private tutoring? maybe talking through your understanding of the concepts and your existing approaches to questions may shed some perspective and help you see things differently. you can read the reviews on tutoring and decide. best of luck!
On the test day is the bubble sheet detachable from the test booklet? So far I have been PTing with the bubble sheet detached and on my right side while my test questions on my left side. It suddenly occurred to me if that is possible on the test day? If not, how would you guys go about it? Thanks!
I agree with you! is this a really bad question?
or is there something we are not seeing……
I do not understand how this question works. i thought that ( E) did have relevance to the survey results because it clearly shows that the question was framed with bias- simply because the survey that magazine conducted was concerned with other issues while other surveys explored other issues- therefore shows it supports the premise (1) that the question is biased.
Isn't (B) a really bad answer choice because you have to make the assumption that it the financial magazine falls under "most of the magazines" you are talking about.
Ah, at first I did not know what parts the Zachary's argument played in response to Stephen and how such a dialogue-form of MSS questions worked which is why i got it wrong. i had assumed that both Zachary's statements and stephen's statement were premises for which i had to find the conclusion for - what i wrong assumption. the correct answer would be a stephen's response to zachary's argument that is found in his conclusion, namely that one would be able to get michaelangelo's intended painting should we take apart all the add-ons. and so the correct answer would be one that challenges this- that you would not be able to get michaelangelo's intended painting even if you take apart all the add-ons. and the reason why B is the correct answer is because it contains the key word in the argument 'intended'.
i also noticed that the wrong answers do not hedge their answers and have very strong absolute statement,that by itself is a red-flag. e.g. (a) use of impossible.
I was deciding between A and C, and went for C. The trick to this question is to concretize it. I was working with the abstract language and it tripped me. I eliminated A because of the word 'represent' and the surrealist was concluding that models need to be taken from inside the psyche as well. And i made brain made an inaccurate error by concluding that internal psyche stuff cannot be represented.
MORAL of story/my conclusion: concretize
i think answer choice A explains the flaw in the argument because it shows/explains why the premises are way off from the conclusion. in other words, it explains why the premises ( horses being noble and gentle) do the support/lead to the conclusion (it is an unconscious expression of fear).
answer choice A says that "the reasoning is flawed because the argument fails to show that the mythical creature mentioned represents the horse in people's mind".
in other words it says the argument does not link the representation of horses in people's mind to the mythical creation
by not linking the two, it fails to show and therefore fails to support.