Subscription pricing
Does the app require a separate account from my 7sage account? I've tried to log in multiple times yesterday and today with the correct email address or username and password only to see "wrong password" or "try later".
PT Questions
christianripley654
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
christianripley654
Thursday, Sep 26 2013
I dream of such a world. Unfortunately the meme's argument is not valid; resulting in the far more unfortunate reality that chocolate is not salad.
Currently, it looks like this:
Chocolate ––> Cocoa ––> Tree ––> Plant
-----------------------------------------------
Chocolate ––> Salad
Don't worry, we can fix the problem.
What we need is: Plant ––> Salad or / Salad ––> /Plant
christianripley654
Monday, Nov 19 2012
Isn't "required" the conditional indicator as it's the same idea as "requires" which is in basic translation group 2?
christianripley654
Wednesday, Sep 18 2013
Thanks!
christianripley654
Wednesday, Sep 18 2013
I just purchased PT69. I'm obviously going to take it before watching the recording of J.Y. doing the LR sections; however, I am unable to locate this option. Could someone help me out? Thanks!
christianripley654
Thursday, Dec 05 2013
Alan,
I changed my password but the results are the same. I've been extremely careful to ensure the correct input of my email and password so I do not think that is the issue. No worries though, in the meantime I can make an account specifically for use with the app.
christianripley654
Friday, Nov 01 2013
I used to have problems pre-phrasing and answering flaw questions that do not assert a logical fallacy such as an error of composition/division, a false choice, or a source argument. These are those questions that assert a flaw with the assumption made in the author's argument. The flaw being the presumption that a necessary assumption of the argument is true; this occurs in two ways. First, through not providing support for a necessary assumption. Second, through the lack of consideration that the necessary assumption is false.
Take a look at the flaw questions below, but treat them like a necessary assumption question. In doing so, find the assumption and then look for an answer that asserts the presumption of its truth in one of the two ways described above. Hope this helps.
Examples:
(1) PT35 S1 Q23
(2) PT35 S4 Q24
Same score, similar experience. I missed 14 b/w the two sections after averaging -7 b/w them. I blind reviewed and missed 3.
Even though I know not to, there were a few questions that I spent time on juggling between answer choices which threw me off pace, so I had to rush at the end of both sections to the extent that I had to blindly fill in "D" for two questions on each.
The results:
11 of 14 wrong answers occurred after question 17
9 of 14 wrong answers occurred after question 19
For anyone that struggles with time be sure to read the "Why You Must Skip Questions on the LSAT" blog post: 7sage.com/why-you-have-to-skip-questions-on-the-lsat/
I climbed. I felt rushed. I Missed 3 questions in a row. Now I'm retaking in December.