- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
thank you !
Adding to this, but its a MBT question in disguise
For the correct Answer choice C , when you did the contrapositive of the AC its like a MBT, because that contrapositive is supported by the stimulus
( the chain you did
/explain basics ---> flawed. #feedback
I used your approach in the same way and got 5/5 on drills, I pretty much would take the AC plug it into my P+P+P= C to see if that AC would make my conclusion valid, I did get a question where the AC was a contrapositive, the method still worked i just did the contrapositive of what my equation was .
*typo I thought what follows after unless is necessary condition
where can i learn about negate sufficient on answer choice D, i thought "unless" was a sufficient term. #feedback #feedback
Got confused with the wording of cannot prevent in A/C C. meaning resisting tech in the industry will not stop job loss of occurring ,therefore its a possibility of job loss to happen .
im in! hope its not too late
I had a different analysis on why B is right, B is saying some of the minted gold was from gold that was unrefined with gold content less than 92% , the stimulus did say MOST gold was minted from Senegal but not "ALL"... most is like 50% so there could of been possibility that other types of gold that was used was less than 92% unrefined. Answer choice B is not a MBT its a CBT, i think that is why the answer doesn't seem perfect because its just one possibility out of many but its still could be true based on what was provided from stimulus. This is my perception of this answer. #feedback#feedback#feedback