me with must be true questions. i cant explain how i get the answers right except by going with my gut and just choose the answer that i instinctively know is right
How am I getting ANY of these right? I haven't missed one yet... and I'm like "uh.... maybe it's this? because it Ain't any of these other stupid ones"
A big change I made was bridging the gap between the premise and conclusion versus trying to use information from the context. Once I stopped trying to rely on the context as support I found the correct answer.
Generally, I try to only diagram on paper when I'm reviewing a question that I flagged. It's much more efficient during timed attempts to diagram mentally rather than diagram on paper. That being said, it can be beneficial to diagram mentally and during blind review diagram on paper.
I'm so proud of myself on this one! I got the right answer in 37 seconds because I read the stimulus and was able to hunt for the answer I knew I needed. I'm really starting to understand this q-type!!!
This might be werid but when I take the time to diagram it I always overthink and its not clear to me it acutally confuses me more but when I read it and look for answer its right. I got this right without even doing anything simply becuase D looked right but no way of knowing... strange
@nimaroxo It supports the conclusion that traditional classroom education is ineffective. It's one of the reasons, in addition to classroom education being ineffective because it doesn't develop students' insights.
I'm not sure if the way I do it is right, but when doing these questions, I just find the conclusion, the first premise that follows, and try to connect the two. For this one, I read the first sentence, notice it is the conclusion, then find the "P1" and try to bridge the two. This almost always results in the right answer, the only times it is wrong is when I personally don't read correctly. To me, I saw this and said "Okay the education is not effective and doesn't lead to student insight. This must mean that if it leads to insight, it is effective." And then I found D from there. I'm not sure if this is 100% foolproof, but on my analytics for PT's I have almost a 90% across the last 5 PT's. I would love to know if any of you have any comments on this to know if I am doing something wrong or if anyone else does it this way. I don't really graph it out in my mind or on paper, just playing a quick 1-minute game of connect the dots LR style.
153 comments
LOVEEEE when I get the question wrong AND go over the target time! SO FUN!
the fellow 37 likes to this gives me peace of mind
1 am studying, have gotten all of these you trys wrong.... i think i hit a wall and its time for bed!
F&$*W these questions!!!
I got this right bc I remembered negate sufficient omfg life saver
Same!! I love 7 sage!!!
I think I'm getting these now, time to pick myself up off the freeway
The hope is still there. No freeway tonight lol
LMAOOO i saw your last comment I'm dying!!!!
Nice now there's space for me
Starting to feel like its best to go with my gut on these
me with must be true questions. i cant explain how i get the answers right except by going with my gut and just choose the answer that i instinctively know is right
same, got it right at first but then blind reviewed it wrong :/
how tf am I getting the harder ones correct right away but the easy ones wrong and taking hella time on them? I'm broken fr😔🤘
Same
Same
How am I getting ANY of these right? I haven't missed one yet... and I'm like "uh.... maybe it's this? because it Ain't any of these other stupid ones"
lmao real
I will overcome sufficient-necessity confusion!!
i really wish this guy would teach us how to think without lawgic. he's mentioned various times that lawgic is too time consuming...
same like why are you writing a thousand scribbles that are impossible to read i have like 30 seconds bruv
"Harder, right, than the previous questions?" What. Found this by far the easiest of the section. How they determine difficulty on these baffles me.
That probably means you're good with formal logic! :)
Correct before blind review 🔥🔥🔥🔥
It really starting to stick.
A big change I made was bridging the gap between the premise and conclusion versus trying to use information from the context. Once I stopped trying to rely on the context as support I found the correct answer.
Same. Took me slowing down. This one took 6 mins, but I didn't give up, as I had in the past.
is it ok that we intuitively understand this question and got the right answer instead of diagramming it out during the timed question drill?
#help
Generally, I try to only diagram on paper when I'm reviewing a question that I flagged. It's much more efficient during timed attempts to diagram mentally rather than diagram on paper. That being said, it can be beneficial to diagram mentally and during blind review diagram on paper.
I'm so proud of myself on this one! I got the right answer in 37 seconds because I read the stimulus and was able to hunt for the answer I knew I needed. I'm really starting to understand this q-type!!!
social process→develop student insightsConclusion:
education is effectiveD)
develop student insights→education is effectiveChain and done, is this right? The explanation in the video seems over complicated.
Looks right to me, big dog
@sheadongraham that's what i did too. lawgic made it unnec confusing tbh
This might be werid but when I take the time to diagram it I always overthink and its not clear to me it acutally confuses me more but when I read it and look for answer its right. I got this right without even doing anything simply becuase D looked right but no way of knowing... strange
I give up on this I'll never understand it
this section is frying me
this does not make any sense
@HarveySpectator i am genuinely at a loss with these
i don't know how many times i have to fall for this Suff-Necessity confusion to never get fooled again...
I don't know how any of this makes sense to anyone. I am going back to the foundations.
What makes premise 2 a premise and not simply context?
@nimaroxo It supports the conclusion that traditional classroom education is ineffective. It's one of the reasons, in addition to classroom education being ineffective because it doesn't develop students' insights.
I'm not sure if the way I do it is right, but when doing these questions, I just find the conclusion, the first premise that follows, and try to connect the two. For this one, I read the first sentence, notice it is the conclusion, then find the "P1" and try to bridge the two. This almost always results in the right answer, the only times it is wrong is when I personally don't read correctly. To me, I saw this and said "Okay the education is not effective and doesn't lead to student insight. This must mean that if it leads to insight, it is effective." And then I found D from there. I'm not sure if this is 100% foolproof, but on my analytics for PT's I have almost a 90% across the last 5 PT's. I would love to know if any of you have any comments on this to know if I am doing something wrong or if anyone else does it this way. I don't really graph it out in my mind or on paper, just playing a quick 1-minute game of connect the dots LR style.
I used the same strategy for this question!
Heck yeah! I'm actually getting some level 4 questions right. Granted, I'm over the target time 🥲
I dont know why I keep getting these wrong the first time but correct in the BR.