This really isn't LSAT related, but David and Goliath by Malcolm Gladwell is a great read.
You could just delete you blind review score, and then enter in your "new" answers as BR and then have a record of both that way.
@7sagestudentservices is there any chance the logic games videos will be up before the December LSAT?
I just got an email from LSAT Hacks saying they have put the PT 76 LR and RC explanations on the site. They are not free like the rest of explanantions, but if you took the Oct test and plan on taking the December LSAT it might be worth looking into. Here is the link...
http://lsathacks.com/product/lsat-preptest-76-explanations-pdf/
I think LSATHACKS.com is extremely useful for LR explinations
Here is their explination:
FACTS:
1-You should not greatly exceed the recommended daily intake (RDA) of vitamins A and D – they are toxic.
2-Some vitamin fortified foods have 100% of the daily intake of those vitamins per serving.
3-Many people eat 2-3x the standard servings of some vitamin fortified foods.
ANALYSIS: We know “some” vitamin fortified cereals have 100% of the RDA. It’s a warranted assumption that other vitamin fortified cereals have a significant percent of the RDA, say 30-50%.
We know some people eat 2-3x the recommended serving. And it’s a warranted assumption that people get vitamin A and D from other food sources – everyone knows that.
This is just a most strongly supported question. It’s probable, though not certain, that at least one person, somewhere in the world, has exceeded the RDA by eating lots of vitamin fortified cereal.
PT 33 Sec 1 Q22 is a flaw - except question(each of the following accurately describes a flaw in the lawyers reasoning displayed above except).
I guess this would be an example of multiple flaws in a question.
@grantnicar6 Yea it was. Last time I took it at the Collin County learning center or something. We had a huge table to ourselves and there were only like 15 people to a room. If you retake I would highly recommend you take it there and not UNT.
Just took the October test after getting a 160 in June. I think the LG section was harder this time with the LR and RC being about average with the rest of the 70-75 tests. I also moved on to the 4th (much easier game) and came back to the 3rd. I'm just hoping my other 3 sections make up for what I know will be a below average LG for me. It seemed like the curve breaker LR questions were harder then I usually find them, but they didn't seem to bad after eliminating wrong answers. I also switched test centers this time and that was a terrible decision. My new location had everyone in the same room in the middle of a library filled with people and very crowded tables. Probably going to retake again in December if I don't get at least a 164.
@2543.hopkins I just got outliers in the mail today. I'm going to start reading it tomorrow since I'll be done with my studying after today.