@ said:
I've heard that the paper in the test booklets is pretty thing, and that erasing can rip through it. After reading that multiple times, I've been trying to cut down on erasing as much as possible.
I thought this was the case with older booklets..
@ said:
It’s time consuming, leaves marks, you could accidentally erase the wrong thing.
How exactly is it time consuming?
I just find it more efficient in a lot of cases. Perhaps there is an additional premise, I'll wrrite in just a couple inferences and know the answer. So I'll often just erase the few elements I wrote in to use the "empty" game board for the proceeding questions. Why is erasing so negatively spoken of? How many of you do it anyway?
Yeah I know it's in Charlottesville. I'm wondering what building. I can't find it on LSAC.
What's the address for this center?
The game type is sort of irrelevant. I'm saying when **fool proofing ** any game, say 10 times, should you do it ten times straight right then and there or spread your repetitions out among hours/days.
For those of you have achieved significant improvement fool proofing, do you practice a specific game all at once? Say it's game x form test x you're having issues with. If you decide to repeat it eight times, do you repeat it eight times all at once? Or do you do it four times, do other games and come back to it four times more?? TY
I'm not sure everyone understands my question. I'm not talking about crossing out/erasing errors. More so, "recycling" game boards from question to question. That way you can draw out less new diagrams when given new premises