User Avatar
coleknight42
Joined
Mar 2026
Subscription
Core

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 180
CAS GPA
3.8
1L START YEAR
2028

Applications

Columbia
In process
Harvard
In process
Northwestern
In process
Stanford
In process
UChicago
In process
UPenn
In process
Yale
In process

Discussions

User Avatar

6 hours ago

coleknight42

LR/RC Practice Balance

Hi everyone! I’m wondering whether there is a way to adjust the balance of LR vs RC drills in the practice section of your study plan. Right now it gives me basically 3.5 days a week of LR and 1.5 of RC, but I’m pretty solid on LR and need more RC practice. Is there a way to customize your practice schedule to achieve a more even balance without ignoring my study plan and just doing drills outside of it? Would like to have them laid out for me automatically and be able to track how many I’ve done/have yet to do for the day/week. Thanks!

1
PrepTests ·
PT108.S4.P4.Q25
User Avatar
coleknight42
Yesterday

I understand why answer choice A is correct under a certain interpretation of the question, but I'm not sure why answer choice D wouldn't be correct under any interpretation of the question.

When we discovered (ie, first found) fossil hominids (ie, when we discovered neanderthals, which were the first hominids we found), they "genuinely resembled modern humans" just like the pottery in answer D

Answer B implies making a guess (given that they are unrecovered) about other paintings. But it says in the passage that "the human fossil record has been found in largely reverse order" which implies that these earlier hominids have been found and that the conclusions that anthropologists draw are not educated guesses, but rather actively supported/contradicted by a scope of evidence that answer choice B does not allow for. This is not to mention that these later revelations of earlier hominids don't themselves constitute the "discovery of fossil hominids" because that discovery was that of the neanderthals, depending on how you read the word "discovery."

That some ancient thing was discovered that bore resemblance to some modern thing is explicit in the passage and both answer choices, but the logical continuation presented by the art historians in answer choice B feels different enough from that of the passage to make it less correct than the equally accurate but less comprehensive analogy presented in D

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?