#help okay so hypothesis always = the conclusion? #help #help
#help Does anybody have advice on how to get better at spotting the correct answer/problem with the argument in these very subtle arguments? #help
I AM STILL LOST! I don't understand the "sometimes" part, how does that mean that it would be OK in some cases???? #help#help#help#help#help #help
So I kinda picked up on the flaw because D did look attractive but I didn't choose it because I couldn't really understand what it actually meant. can someone please breakdown AC D? how is it actually saying that it confuses routine with NEVER? #help #help
#help so basically the correct answer choice for this type of question (MBF) has to directly contradict the information in the stimulus?
Even if an answer choice talks about bunnies when the stimulus is about planes, that is considered being compatible? because it does not directly go against the information in the stimulus....? #help #help #help
#help can someone please give me an example of an argument that fits the description of C looks look?
Thank you so much Paula!
From what LSAT/PrepTest is the grouping game discussed in this episode?
I hope someone is able to tell me :smile:
Hi guys,
Has anyone listened to the latest episode of the 7Sage podcast published on October 10th titled "Building Better Boards - Tips for Logic Games"? If there's someone here that has listened to it and knows from what PrepTest the grouping game discussed is please let me know.
Thank you :)
correlation is a statistic. it is not absolute it is not a conditional statement. Correlation allows for non-conforming data points. Which is why answer choice A and D do not weaken the argument.
This question's stimulus took me out
your explanation is above and beyond great. thank you for taking the time to share it in such detail.
it worries me that i was not able to think about HOW answer choice B strengthens the argument.... but your explanation clearly strengthens it.
ugh i knew A was right as soon as i read it but i was too tempted by B because i couldn't understand HOW it strengthen the argument and so i decided to go with B unfortunately. damn.
same literally just made a note to pay close attention to the question stem and not just assume that it's always the author's argument that needs to be strengthen/weaken.
it's okay, everyday we learn something new and we build from that. we got this!
AC E is correct because it doesn’t strengthen nor weaken the argument.
The argument is that the is reason to be skeptical about the conclusions of the magazine.
So, AC C is a contradiction to what the magazine’s survey states, which would cause skepticism, which, in turn, strengthens the argument.
Damn i was stuck between answer choice A and D and sadly went with D. UGH. what got me is that i interpreted "but also genuine interaction with them' as an alternative solution which is what D states.
Did this happen to anyone else? please let me know how that does not count as an alternative solution and what "various alternative solutions are possible for a single problem" would actually look like in a stimulus/argument. #help #help #help #help
#help is providing an alternative explanation the same things as using a parallel case? for example when an answer choice reads "questioning a claim about why something is the case by supplying an alternative explanation" or if it reads "cites facts that tend to weaken the force of the evidence with which the author supports her/his conclusion/hypothesis".
are those two the equivalence of answer choice C in this problem? - "Uses a parallel case to illustrate a weakness in the ornithologist's argument"
are they the same method of reasoning?
#help #help #help
brilliant