Is it fair to look at the conclusions of strengthening questions and focus on answers that have a direct impact on making the conclusion “more true”?

I.e the answer clearly states that a corporation who took action (discourage) was a direct impact on curtailing funding.

If I look at the other answers, most of the answers don’t mention corporations taking action.

Is that applicable to most strengthening questions? Or, is this an outlier?

@dsandi yes, “each” needs to be emphasized, because whether there are 1,5,10,15 - each of them got the cert.

Can “caused by” be a consistent indicator to demonstrate the causal relationship?

I.e. “This decline NGO (B) is caused by corresponding growth of gov services (A)” Therefore, anything that follows “caused by” can be interpreted in lawgic as B “caused by” A, means A causes B.

Is that universal for “caused by” being an “indicator”.

I’m still trying to understand why “each of the many” does not mean “some”? I saw many and immediately made it “some”.