- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Please sign me up.
I felt exactly how you feel and have the same work schedule as you. My work schedule is 8:30 - 5 or sometimes I come in early to do 7:30 - 4. My study schedule was the same as yours except I would study for 1 hour before work started if I went in at 8:30. Coming home after a long 8 hours to study for 3 or 4 hours is difficult especially if you already feel mentally drained from your job, which I did. This schedule made me feel extremely mentally exhausted and I would get burnt out very quickly when studying. I would frequently take breaks which some were longer than they should have been and probably unnecessary as well. I wasn't seeing any improvements and my focus and performance really sucked. So I recently switched my full-time schedule to part-time for 2 months Feb. and March. Now my schedule is:
Wake up @
Workout for 30 minutes
Study LR (blind review & write out explanations) 7-9
Work 10-2
Drill LR questions 4-5
LG (foolproof) 6-8
RC 8:30-10:30
I started this schedule on February 3rd and the first week I developed a positive attitude and outlook when studying. Now I feel excited to study. I do not dread having to wake up early nor am I dreading to study after work. I am doing everything untimed for now until I feel I have mastered LR. Sometime in March I will start to take timed practiced sections throughout the week and will take full PT on the weekends. I thought about quitting as well, but then I thought that would be too much time on my hands and I may not use it constructively.
@ Can you provide insight on your study schedule?
Click convert it.
https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/14336/here-was-my-study-schedule-for-my-20-point-increase
Yes, I am interested.
I am interested! Is it too late to join?
Assumption- A stronger economy is likely to make it more difficult to find day-care because once the economy becomes stronger there will not be any new hires or there will not be more new hires than employees who have quit. Hence, that is why we need AC (B) to be true because if there are more new hires than employees who chose to stay then that wrecks the argument.
(A) Do not need this to be true
(C) Assumes that enough employees will quit which will make it more difficult for parents to find day-care. We cannot assume that a lot of employees will quit, which leads us to the negation test. If we negate this and the number of workers stays the same then this does not wreck the argument. If we negate it and say the number of employees employed will increase makes me feel like we are adding an assumption. I picked this answer but now I understand why it is incorrect.
For (D) and (E) we do not need them to be true.